From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Simple isearch concerns Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2021 19:27:41 +0000 Message-ID: <9ff81b52fa878cb35a86@heytings.org> References: <20210403001539.x4rb55dvh46rmhb3.ref@Ergus> <20210403001539.x4rb55dvh46rmhb3@Ergus> <878s5wmsjp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87mtubz4ls.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8735w22s9b.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <3ec7e2e58a3733a48ae9@heytings.org> <878s5tc0rn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <3ec7e2e58a49d4f0ec99@heytings.org> <878s5t9p1i.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <9ff81b52fad2911cc740@heytings.org> <87im4w1tgw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38660"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Ergus , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 08 21:28:50 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lUaKg-0009xd-Hu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 21:28:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33614 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUaKf-0006TR-Jh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:28:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUaJe-0005MV-0Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:27:46 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:34410) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUaJb-0007WB-TN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:27:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1617910061; bh=Cm2pVXmph0yAuSIEm3uEAdMjO666lsJVv7QUmG0PDz8=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=DiyOvry6oJELyTUgnxJDXeMxxLrGi1Bhy61AdfQdbkxZLfJ7xZw43xMQT4L56xhI3 gU3NNwJziVKIjFBp74JTOvrGkz1z6sLUPNjK745df1FefBR1NP0g02x9jls8abxmyM JZPPJqoSUUyDwuklJPQxoFozY014h329fLkTUnx6tU5G3Q0RDH+oHChxc6wqVBHywH /cwI1Y2dp2rZrmRDdw1lzaYOin3AHLYlEPzcXCUmkOGSt/HNzYw7IYtTI/rs6STIT+ ZUmflNfSWdAUGmqrLDWZmg2YaKumwRKg4F9onLzgAcl2qa5UQ4Mlq1vO8MOugwnUrI tRmeeSvddQ0jw== In-Reply-To: <87im4w1tgw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267660 Archived-At: >>>> With C-p it's not clear (to me) if it should depend on the current >>>> direction of the search or not. Should C-s C-p change the direction >>>> to a backward search, or move to previous line and restart a forward >>>> search? >>> >>> The same question applies to scroll-up-command and >>> scroll-down-command, e.g. in a forward search using scroll-up-command >>> should change the direction? >> >> For scroll-up-command and scroll-down-command that would not make >> sense: it would mean that you start searching at window-end and search >> backward. > > Surely it should search forward after moving to window-end. But the > question is: when the search direction was backward initially before > calling scroll-up-command, should it keep the same backward direction, > or should it change the direction to forward (since internally it used > the forward search after moving to window-end). > Do I understand correctly that your remark is about the internal variable 'isearch-forward', and whether its value should change when using "fast forward/backward" searches? If so, would that make a difference in practice? IIUC it is changed by isearch-beginning-of-buffer and isearch-end-of-buffer.