From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Davis Herring Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about intended behavior of 'insert-for-yank-1'. Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:16:58 -0600 Organization: XCP-1 Message-ID: <9eae5d28-92d7-e0f8-8002-6e74f2dd84a4@lanl.gov> References: <874m5lr92d.fsf@red-bean.com> <83eg4p9hqk.fsf@gnu.org> <87inu1ghud.fsf@red-bean.com> <83y42x7yud.fsf@gnu.org> <87poo8g2zi.fsf@red-bean.com> <7abf7a00-3f17-4ef6-bfbd-0f5df4e7acd6@default> <87twcutfqe.fsf@red-bean.com> <83twcuorrq.fsf@gnu.org> <87oa31qm22.fsf@red-bean.com> <83shscodl1.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuocnhb2.fsf@red-bean.com> <837f9om0yt.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1475612275 27302 195.159.176.226 (4 Oct 2016 20:17:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 20:17:55 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 Cc: Karl Fogel , Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 04 22:17:51 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1brW9p-0005uK-4L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 22:17:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45111 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brW9n-00012g-LA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:17:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38803) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brW9B-00012H-VW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brW97-0001ZR-LN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:17:04 -0400 Original-Received: from proofpoint4.lanl.gov ([2001:400:4210:400::a4]:39237) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1brW97-0001Yt-BJ; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:17:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailrelay1.lanl.gov (mailrelay1.lanl.gov [128.165.4.101]) by mailgate4.lanl.gov (8.15.0.59/8.15.0.59) with ESMTP id u94KGw9W029316; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:16:58 -0600 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay1.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0AA142564D; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:16:58 -0600 (MDT) X-NIE-2-Virus-Scanner: amavisd-new at mailrelay1.lanl.gov Original-Received: from chinstrap.lanl.gov (chinstrap.lanl.gov [128.165.123.246]) by mailrelay1.lanl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A521425646; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 14:16:58 -0600 (MDT) In-Reply-To: <837f9om0yt.fsf@gnu.org> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.15.154, 1.0.3, 0.0.0000 definitions=2016-10-04_07:2016-10-04, 2016-10-04, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:400:4210:400::a4 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207986 Archived-At: >>> You need to understand the logic behind the instructions in >>> CONTRIBUTE: the release branch should only get fixes that are either >>> necessary, or are safe, i.e. cannot possibly break the release. And >>> doc changes obviously belong to this latter class. >> >> I understand that logic. However, do you mean s/only/always/ above? > > I don't see the difference. "Only" means "always" in this case. The two possible meanings are "the release branch should get only fixes..." or "only the release branch should get fixes" (which is equivalent to "the release branch should get all fixes"). Of course, both can be true (iff). Davis -- This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during shipping.