From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 00:14:12 +0200 Message-ID: <9d0b3156-e8b2-c2d8-0d0c-a025861e5e0c@yandex.ru> References: <20170202202418.GA2505@acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486073855 7881 195.159.176.226 (2 Feb 2017 22:17:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 22:17:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0 To: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 02 23:17:31 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cZPh5-0001qS-7w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 23:17:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59245 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZPhA-0003YG-RR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 17:17:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59938) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZPe1-0001lb-E1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 17:14:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZPe0-0002o4-Mq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 17:14:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x242.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::242]:36690) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cZPdv-0002lI-Tt; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 17:14:16 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x242.google.com with SMTP id r18so1188717wmd.3; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 14:14:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=thABRKoOWM+ml72fxwn/112ryn9KIGROZEiw2eSgmbE=; b=fGLZndKHVpklZprhkzFP9YoiaPlZ2psKTcJaeHiKjA9yjm1j+SL1/71thyyzefMMOW tDYJjEpIzRDiZatM8ansIRfQ1FzqND++9MaLq1Cj6QM/kddnf8KxoQk8NctZks5fpGoT f/PJvZkJkkPt1namBjVyLg1u8MGhATin7b1kNv0XlcgJfBNhdn+xr/h+3bdc2mJ17Ib6 T0VfJvTWpKi4EPYiIoDz+8VYvHcaHfCI60/SEoI/0HIBDv8gCIBxqvRvivcT4forxvwd htwgzEh+zhlPOqWRlEq0HxsxLGl4sG//fSdI2GqTequyGCnvh4t85aY1WdNDjeyWAOpN X6LQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=thABRKoOWM+ml72fxwn/112ryn9KIGROZEiw2eSgmbE=; b=lyqh9HRZzYdzeN787rFYndfTdkgj7FBDsEpgSGvfj39khuoCyDC/H//hM6Bh0awSJU H5pFK1Ns0NO9EjMKahytVtm1zxybZZJg53OnCNEyA7q3YrP3q4TPw9OW3pZ35zXS2/p8 uK2fJ0GB6LFNMU1JNzhxmLidhnq7sJCelbf8zz6A8LkuAzazrl4EVXSbarpfXCrtCumZ OwgDfKDOkFHtcRrJu7OJY5h+d/E31Qalec6zGxF86sEqMauLy84ozaMMUi3W2ulCz0Qx nSZ3CVJSv6kr2Hmfr+aHDLLMQ8BwOa3ryr4PZ+ZA7TzSo3hzJOPKTs/X2yE4EymgLwJ4 1XhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI7HDlx+wowLqXR3iNpO5FRfevHIJ2Lycn6lF/xjvHsxmb5boC0zrIK8kM0QWgm2Q== X-Received: by 10.28.139.74 with SMTP id n71mr10078313wmd.139.1486073654593; Thu, 02 Feb 2017 14:14:14 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.173.41]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u198sm37459198wmf.9.2017.02.02.14.14.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Feb 2017 14:14:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170202202418.GA2505@acm> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::242 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211899 Archived-At: On 02.02.2017 22:24, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > I think we are all agreed that Emacs should handle correctly formed > comments in C. comment-cache does correctly handle comments, and it has > been shown to be essentially no slower than master. Alan, you seem to have abandoned the previous discussion. Why don't we finish it first? You have been asked for some extra measurements, including the ones using the alternative patch. I still haven't seen those yet.