From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Improving describe-mode and discoverability Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 01:10:54 +0300 Message-ID: <9c928ea6-6799-d096-de54-b2bf7ac140ec@yandex.ru> References: <576C2A6C.3090908@gmail.com> <576C59AF.7080902@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466719883 3762 80.91.229.3 (23 Jun 2016 22:11:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 22:11:23 +0000 (UTC) To: Drew Adams , =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= , Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 24 00:11:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bGCqB-0003AO-MY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:11:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39657 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGCq7-0008Mv-BN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:11:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54984) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGCpz-0008Mp-QG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGCpt-00084N-P4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]:36014) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bGCpt-00084H-IY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 18:10:57 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f126so1616996wma.1 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:10:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L6y0vxHVZ6BYz9atK7omnNOBAf7hZ5VKicQcKOV6oL0=; b=JSh8k6siH00PKP7KZvTMHYj5UD2YpBAuMD658Pi0NBTJ5pxbDMJc831kYb0ndFLxsu 1hmAPcoHUInZMxQJ7e+r0dzoipHGjo0boR5nnfDfShsFg7t3UDmB/NBYNtFJBXg7zv4q r/bkZo/GKD6Mjda4R09G63O1elDyKAoJb+A9ZRiHIFQquAfn84OudxNRaphGIfkdIZUD EyHQ2z6C+o+2UdzVHtks9f/9aJ8+JN5zGCmfbnvL1lPyGfxwC2D/lCAcxYnVo3IupnQH q6Ftee0ccrdd5wUa+dRpDX0Y2L6tcNfXF0jXXIiKu9dQ+2yJA7mTIOcjkyWCzbisTk3o 6xyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L6y0vxHVZ6BYz9atK7omnNOBAf7hZ5VKicQcKOV6oL0=; b=EqvN62f5OIzepGRS4PP6nr8MqbRhgGyLZ1dYXmsbFkMWGnb60qMzUUnxXOzqY6/4SI mN7Ssu+nzCy4GwGsPgAHz/sTi0oiDXez9A6FReyFtGPHwoRk0fZFRmbfsW3B4OsO/p0j fHyIT9F3NiTHmvYslaKWvbXscFUUbnWqi+MKg1jHrOq5pqb0WGCviwdnvnuqm/tuPYBK JNsvbnLYyquf1OlVITh4s0U0AhSFlq4/XeDUwhhmROr72yS0w6NrmYKEMArIk8dLwM0f 8cmhOuyFAqUeLIptPd1d65w4VcZoL/VwaIFcWhN9hb9cm8yTXihKybDk/LjUD5tG0Oav +fKA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLOnDuW/53O4WPT60Lf9FeaLgtPPWt+onk+drgKAIXvG2pL7ycIp6rNlYkk+nic7g== X-Received: by 10.28.146.9 with SMTP id u9mr16046877wmd.52.1466719856883; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.173.135]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ib10sm2020728wjb.31.2016.06.23.15.10.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:10:56 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:47.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/47.0 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204711 Archived-At: On 06/24/2016 01:07 AM, Drew Adams wrote: >> Of course, we could put this behaviour behind a flag. > > If it is a new construct instead of a replacement for \\{...} > then there is no need for a flag. I'd prefer a flag (or just the new behavior). There's no need to split the community here: if I user likes this output, they'll want to see it in all mode descriptions, not just the ones that opted in.