From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Byte-compilation warnings on w32 Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:29:03 -0400 Message-ID: <9bmyik3ik0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <2f7i9z903n.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220747462 8996 80.91.229.12 (7 Sep 2008 00:31:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 00:31:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 07 02:31:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kc8C2-0002DT-LM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:31:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35101 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kc8B2-00045U-QH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:30:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kc8Ay-00043y-3H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:30:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kc8Aw-00043j-PK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:30:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36820 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kc8Aw-00043g-JI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:30:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:59569) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kc8Aw-0006Hl-BC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:30:46 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Kc89H-00037v-JW; Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:29:03 -0400 X-Spook: covert video TWA infowar Aldergrove Watergate Bellcore X-Ran: j1o!xM&b/RXV-M'U$=4jcbkt?]'HB;Y9WPswRB":^:,xWu&lfHW3{Ik?[1;6?#="-]inFd X-Hue: red X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Sun, 07 Sep 2008 09:11:07 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103620 Archived-At: Kenichi Handa wrote: > Thank you. For the time being, I made Tibetan to use directly > font-shape-gstring. That means, Emacs can display Tibetan only with > a proper OTF font. After I fixed some other bugs, I'll make Tibetan > use tibetan-composition-function and and fix it work even if > font-shape-gstring fails. Thanks. Do you have time to look at this patch: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832 It would be nice if the nextstep port could build again...