From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: D Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gnus: (documentation) bug? gnus-extra-headers Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 17:43:15 +0000 Message-ID: <9afed251-7159-a59c-b17f-91925a01886f@posteo.net> References: <479d6005-75ab-543b-d5a6-2560fc018adc@posteo.net> <87v97in4xh.fsf@gnus.org> <42e1ab2d-242e-af25-f323-98d6f3428f8a@posteo.net> <87lf8dlb8j.fsf@gnus.org> <87mtst8nwl.fsf@igel.home> <87pmxpjv06.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26696"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 17 19:44:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lihIK-0006lh-HV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 19:44:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53428 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lihIJ-0001Bu-Ix for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:44:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lihH0-0007qC-4U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:43:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:46831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lihGy-00009j-0K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 13:43:21 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 853A124002B for ; Mon, 17 May 2021 19:43:17 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1621273397; bh=9nDxLfRsOm35qjnFsziOBK9ddTnjcAXwqMTnAbB34LU=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:From; b=WTNT8uJdTzjyZte5WukeY6LHPEajs1kQKWktiWjrfTvqQtoM1fs28qBF0PjT/L44n UC18mbHrYHO/a8ivq8Wy3dn0CF4n2J4+rk9Fx3VTkZe5H7Ldo1cfY6492etjJcJ+yp ahyZ+Cbvr2zvcHzpOkMhVw2QOYKgtsSk9DtHsyDOr1Xzrcrvg+4JElLfSJFGMBgoEJ 79zIv8tUe0rIXbVo5n/mVilQRNLDDudptr5H7iReOG0knjCxi+j/2KNXfjK1H2th9F D7pj5iL/x3hF+riQPEZ/JdeTOr0dMxn3N+Mxf4Ug8DiWei+agJrf2qPYqprcsfnmEu kkHJvgAsBwE5g== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4FkRLX44mJz6tmH; Mon, 17 May 2021 19:43:16 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87pmxpjv06.fsf@gnus.org> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=d.williams@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269418 Archived-At: On 17/05/2021 16:27, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Andreas Schwab writes: > >>> I just tried this myself, and scoring on "extra" headers does indeed not >>> work any more, so it seems like this has regressed recently(ish). >> >> Don't you need to regenerate the NOV files? > > Ah, yes! Thanks. > > Or in the case of nntp, say > > (setq nntp-nov-is-evil t gnus-nov-is-evil t) > > because the "extra" headers aren't included in the NOV headers from the > NNTP server. With those two set, scoring on the "extra" header works > for me. > > Perhaps the manual should mention those in that section -- it does > mention the issue, but not how to work around it. I'll make that change > now... > Works like a charm, thank you very much!