From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should C-x C-x activate the region? [was: C-d deleting region considered harmful] Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:37:37 -0400 Message-ID: <9D8F2EEC-EE65-46A5-BF7C-433E2F1B9D14@gmail.com> References: <87eicrx1ls.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <4C94E03D.8090002@gmail.com><87fwx699pc.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83tylmyclx.fsf@gnu.org> <4C961787.3090907@gmail.com><878w2xsigj.fsf@gmail.com> <100157F1852148F2A192F00F49398690@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284928647 15586 80.91.229.12 (19 Sep 2010 20:37:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 20:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen' , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 19 22:37:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxQdY-000320-T6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 22:37:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46559 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxQdL-0008HD-Ou for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57973 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxQdD-0008H0-QC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:37:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxQdC-0005zL-Qx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:37:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:34855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxQdC-0005zC-Np for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: by qwf7 with SMTP id 7so4294657qwf.0 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:37:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=NZMBCIHtjPuzjDPg+qKTxib7QEbfkdb/h4pdVxOJ/HQ=; b=f9hcPzF6pKuyaA1Cysbs8vV38tjUw9U/EMseZCLUcclfFPJGP8fnu9fbHxx3z/Cpr4 BGKe4Rc7HeiJXFU2cqsYufbEoxjB1X9DNh7kl0hRaLrxMJMnayRsv0lV8IIvKA+PfYEV 6xhz7og1BTtp59nabfTxvmXuMq+5voHHD5Dic= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=xv6dO7kPdhqI9/2XALIg9loin3E3UFc2VRBzHLblhBkXfuaKezuuOsCONsFevjXgOP 78bu9v7VDZXsfNdXb9Mj2wmhglMeA4WUxC6Cylj6iKvbUjmxkXS/ECd/VDzGgrij8M6o ieWHdZGVXEox9QP63iIahEOAI46Iyqyfm/wrs= Original-Received: by 10.229.231.4 with SMTP id jo4mr5582836qcb.22.1284928621509; Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:37:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.15] (pool-72-95-198-253.pitbpa.east.verizon.net [72.95.198.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 9sm6695567qca.30.2010.09.19.13.36.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 19 Sep 2010 13:36:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <100157F1852148F2A192F00F49398690@us.oracle.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130502 Archived-At: On Sep 19, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Drew Adams wrote: >=20 >> Perhaps `C-x C-x' is the prime annoyance factor here? It=20 >> certainly was for me. Perhaps it just shouldn't activate >> the transient mark mode? > are there many such annoyed users? If so > then perhaps we should simply make that change to the default = behavior: _not_ > have `C-x C-x' activate the region. +1=