From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Enabling native compilation by default when libgccjit is present Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 04:03:26 +0300 Message-ID: <99778fc6-10f0-4332-9552-ea8c699acf90@yandex.ru> References: <83wnkm94oq.fsf@gnu.org> <87y251vdeh.fsf@gnus.org> <87lf11tlzf.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1atrsp9.fsf@gnus.org> <8735n85fa5.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1arskmq.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1arsjpu.fsf@yahoo.com> <87ilw3sjlr.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1ar4mi2.fsf@gmail.com> <874k7nw32n.fsf@gnus.jao.io> <1F4D4305-BD00-4EAF-900F-34F0C1315359@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14173"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jim Myhrberg , "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 06 02:04:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mu2R4-0003Lo-Gk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2021 02:04:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56488 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mu2R2-0004tH-Ew for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2021 20:04:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mu2QH-0004D9-MH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Dec 2021 20:04:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::134] (port=40763 helo=mail-lf1-x134.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mu2QF-00068P-Um; Sun, 05 Dec 2021 20:04:05 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id l22so21314941lfg.7; Sun, 05 Dec 2021 17:04:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mZFSX6GfDY9xK5o6xbxephi2TqJljLfPjbqDSsmmPEM=; b=pgzWN/OQ+ePoUiCP9GbgqVDp3nhuir74kI1GE2dmsB8/mRdh682+n/XzEZt3QFa/Cw AOyKgXtTn9whDu5rT1v8jAsYFmIZ4af72ZWFwisaWa3Nutrfn8Koe4BYXG61fTb5UlF5 qJqIiEbPacUSOZDk4sZTSxmi8VXqzYiB5/cuBjiPfvqnLsP8e5vou/4Vt0OMC0j9iyBG zO1LiF04Zp3dU1rdd6W/oV0kA3evOBB7WpJfo9PV5Wce+r5fh6JLcS52deWrm++PqEkY L5wCQql2VjommOW+VLvvRaFLkWz27fhjEqgoxc+T27z92frT/WL+0xaBUCsJdJ6WauKe RYyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mZFSX6GfDY9xK5o6xbxephi2TqJljLfPjbqDSsmmPEM=; b=bxcE2tBXeNL84UlIlR5VG3o/2hPVWNgKt7Iv++4EWX/MK9DzkRj8b2BH+t/nW2nlSV qWSnxGzhhkQLWDCBCkbBAJz1pltqbyAPFcwTj4nvaQOqYLWCIDD4Snm7JivEdpSMJNWa zOIhCWjtDk8gLNSAQpfNKIYkTfWNwQ8yV8Y+gtEoqtdqZHJ+uS8v5IOZ0Jl7DUfdnQOm M8M4oP6Ey2eaHqHX9rd47dTsdK87cBM8/26ENrNtgDV3oIG/HY5JDPc+P6WGIQPGt8Uz AlhYZNzVIWd6h8Mowxcx3EMAOl20NIwaoGga8c5dKXRZ7gvgJVSlI2RDAjHymdZfyeAO nMig== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533Aujt+jE4dBphODStBu/4sXsV1PT89xZnZxRD+sHCmsGVvykOE pXyvCJWKYKLhWK8XiZ4aZAEyZVDQp9c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxPTFmQQnVv14jbIUT4Gl5rVJhmRYHo5q/0IVYuNKlf06EiPemuCzVuP1mMM6gj2KBKUZThWg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3192:: with SMTP id i18mr31535026lfe.569.1638752641035; Sun, 05 Dec 2021 17:04:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.103] ([5.18.233.185]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b26sm1208972lff.148.2021.12.05.17.04.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Dec 2021 17:04:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1F4D4305-BD00-4EAF-900F-34F0C1315359@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::134 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::134; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x134.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.365, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:281040 Archived-At: Hi! On 05.12.2021 23:00, Jim Myhrberg wrote: > Especially in larger Ruby RSpec test files (over 400-500 lines), where each keystroke could take somewhere around 100-1000ms to register. Native-comp solved all of that for me, with everything being fast and responsive, even those worst case scenario RSpec files. Was that with lsp-mode enabled? Because otherwise, I routinely edit RSpec files longer than that, with no sluggishness like the one you described.