From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Consistent face for keys in *Help* and `substitute-command-keys' Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 01:20:12 +0200 Message-ID: <9886fe48-c735-24a1-0d12-ca3ab74824f3@yandex.ru> References: <83a6rhxwah.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmlxspt.fsf@gnu.org> <834khpxr0s.fsf@gnu.org> <8335x8ybw9.fsf@gnu.org> <87czwageno.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878s6xwngp.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <874khjq6p8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <875z1ylrdw.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r1kgu5m3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37543"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov , Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 17 00:21:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lMIzx-0009dG-Sf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:21:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60562 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMIzw-0003zp-Uu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 19:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMIz4-0003Fo-TR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 19:20:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]:38262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lMIz3-00029y-6U; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 19:20:18 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id mj10so74950128ejb.5; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 16:20:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x4JhiD3BoughmVUjVNSLut2AR85Tb/7ZWlLMC3y9D4s=; b=QloXhS/wRwxh9PjX0f3K2OCVPvebfY+glarIakM7xYH9P43byy2+sf6/Hk+vRD8muM +hawOraPkgOAo2PAnmxoPUqAtKsYFex44jTcFmic90ED3Qe2LYOmj1vZVzvhur0nIBim 7LDCn/mGftu2dB5g6Fgozd2nLVxaDHVK6Gf4UKBRDlxpFHpWaXmMnnXeOb3bteDHa6nU xC2HQETsCnwdZ3pLfZ+JBxQfYjRjOWx5vkWYq8wNB/xJD7ORmlEiEt3C3UZKMyVhJAfC MGujh9UdMIzP/X0lg9g19wrPnMEFt206a0viSiWXF/MbyNurEenJLsF5IRouOaJOBW1X Xt4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=x4JhiD3BoughmVUjVNSLut2AR85Tb/7ZWlLMC3y9D4s=; b=KCLPm+XQmWEdVRQ556iKoz9Y1NPuYvDU/W4JSEy8qQ/DJLDpbAQclEhKpih6FCPsk5 qkuigSC6uPHFSmH24ExmbpHX9EoZKGCOjLQIsfEtCQlK9PaD/jlLB58ekNW4ZHsSbbv7 gXk3jeAhadvjEhHC/BpsaGaXHlR7qCDelJs+IueXRMsefMArDsWTv1wr4eSTWhj0VuNv Peb2U4NeqLCq4YdyXOR17W3u1ay1tB4HntOnIlpvN4dg6XI4s0wVaNufghVgxd0ZJaa6 Odgx7yjlZplfz+AlhkjZErxtbOXEwBqOOp7EU/qSIQINJsKCmATwD0Js7l8bp2DEi+0u S5PA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5333u0EoA87DvrP4DLwNlGVwE0VThwsfqKR+GcEnsOav2FfyjFwy kBbT03Z2lWGHS0XMf33VBhIseGFvRbI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxIlWY0mko/vO8G9NiVy9vWXBdS6BFJ3Di7IxKQbgPQeVvbQs9oVxgwTMQpaWARkLgYtyYdtQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:77c5:: with SMTP id m5mr30843848ejn.201.1615936815041; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 16:20:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g11sm7781860edw.37.2021.03.16.16.20.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Mar 2021 16:20:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87r1kgu5m3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62f; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x62f.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266510 Archived-At: On 15.03.2021 11:19, Juri Linkov wrote: > Now that we have a clearly visible border, it's possible to use > the background that you proposed earlier - grey95 that looks nicer > when there is already heavy highlighting with a border and blue foreground. +1 Either way, good job making key sequences stand out better and look more "fresh".