From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f56408a: * lisp/progmodes/xref.el (xref-pop-marker-stack): Don't obsolete. Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:56:18 +0200 Message-ID: <9806D073-4E56-4616-9C94-3F45513E5FE7@acm.org> References: <20211026081718.30075.27468@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20211026081719.E1D3721011@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29274"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 26 10:57:51 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfIHH-0007RL-NT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:57:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34164 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfIHE-0002HO-KN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 04:57:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60310) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfIFv-00018n-Gh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 04:56:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail1477c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.14.77]:43220 helo=mail118c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfIFs-0000W9-I7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 04:56:26 -0400 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1635238580; bh=/uk8TFtpv6e2+3nEPnwOtQ6KURKRExSDVJcwdPDpwfA=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=kroB6oA9O6Yu7d84rknoX1m9JmNVxdDtxtEdIIXTV9UvnXzv312loSJI6or1HNWMJ hm4jKK3Q4hhBVAggeWZg2qSNWedQcpUaMki1Av5MRDUX7+HhooYwsLQoIquDhkQo9/ is1jlABMdB7zddo0Xc02Io40h4P4GRKrdMKi/jRA= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from stanniol.lan (c-b952e353.032-75-73746f71.bbcust.telenor.se [83.227.82.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail118c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 19Q8uI8K007914; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:56:20 +0000 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A742F23.6177C2B4.004B, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.4 cv=CPFJ4TnD c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6177c2b4 a=von4qPfY+hyqc0zmWf0tYQ==:117 a=von4qPfY+hyqc0zmWf0tYQ==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=M51BFTxLslgA:10 a=vaJtXVxTAAAA:8 a=r7Cdu0tym1toU2DzEXYA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-Origin-Country: SE Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=91.136.14.77; envelope-from=mattiase@acm.org; helo=mail118c50.megamailservers.eu X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277825 Archived-At: 26 okt. 2021 kl. 10.48 skrev Dmitry Gutov : >> * lisp/progmodes/xref.el (xref-pop-marker-stack): Don't obsolete. >=20 > Why not? It felt small-minded to generate obsoletion warnings for external = packages that now have to make their code uglier in order to avoid that = if they are particulate about a clean CI, especially if they compile = with byte-compile-error-on-warn (which I often do). The warning doesn't tell them anything useful; the semantics haven't = changed. This is in contrast to the variables made obsolete. Does this reasoning make sense? I could revert the change.