From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bill Wohler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MH-E 7.4.4 checked in Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:14:22 -0700 Organization: Newt Software Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <977.1090941262@newt.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1090941617 2034 80.91.224.253 (27 Jul 2004 15:20:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 15:20:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 27 17:19:59 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BpTkF-0003a2-00 for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 17:19:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BpTnL-0000gB-9K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:23:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BpTnC-0000fs-Qy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BpTnA-0000fR-UY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BpTnA-0000fO-RV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:23:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [207.217.120.119] (helo=bittern.mail.pas.earthlink.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BpTja-0006R8-Hj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:19:18 -0400 Original-Received: from h-69-3-26-246.snvacaid.dynamic.covad.net ([69.3.26.246] helo=olgas.newt.com) by bittern.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1BpTjX-0002FE-00; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:19:15 -0700 Original-Received: from wohler (helo=newt.com) by olgas.newt.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BpTeo-0000Fm-00; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 08:14:22 -0700 Original-To: Kai Grossjohann X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.4+cvs; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 21.3.1 X-Image-URL: http://www.newt.com/wohler/images/bill-diving.png X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26018 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26018 Kai Grossjohann writes: > So usually the ChangeLog in the Tramp repository might have many > entries between two releases, whereas the Emacs repository typically > just has two entries for each release (one for Michael's changes and > one for my own changes). The ChangeLog entries in the Emacs > repository summarize the Tramp entries in such a way that, for > example, changes made and then reverted are not described (since the > intermediate version never showed up in the Emacs repository). > > What do people think about this? It would take days to do this each time I made a release given the volume in the MH-E ChangeLog, so in practice, it would not get done. -- Bill Wohler http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.