From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior? Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:33:58 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <9743-Fri23Jan2004203358+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> References: <877jzn2lk8.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1074883225 9682 80.91.224.253 (23 Jan 2004 18:40:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jas@extundo.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 23 19:40:15 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ak6E3-0001bd-00 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 19:40:15 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ak6E2-00062d-00 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 19:40:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Ak6CN-00015D-PJ for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:38:31 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1Ak6CI-00014u-Mp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:38:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1Ak6Bm-0000dT-Qk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:38:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.23] (helo=aragorn.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Ak6Bm-0000bm-8l; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:37:54 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski (pns03-197-152.inter.net.il [80.230.197.152]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.8-GR) with ESMTP id CGY20966; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 20:37:46 +0200 (IST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:25:57 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:19461 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:19461 > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:25:57 -0500 > > I would expect people to design an MTAs not to wait very long > in the process that you created to send the mail. I'm not an expert, but I always thought that the amount of time they wait is determined by the TCP/IP time-out, which is typically 1 or 2 minutes. At least for those cases where the destination doesn't respond.