From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RMAIL, MIME-related bug Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:00:23 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <9743-Fri17Oct2003090022+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> References: <2914-Thu16Oct2003132048+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <28709.1066310095@www21.gmx.net> <8011-Thu16Oct2003180244+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <874qy8khjk.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1066374543 23229 80.91.224.253 (17 Oct 2003 07:09:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 07:09:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 17 09:09:01 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AAOjN-00080N-00 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:09:01 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AAOjM-0007lx-00 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:09:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AAOgC-0000q6-PH for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 03:05:44 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AAOfy-0000pd-Oy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 03:05:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AAOfS-0000iz-01 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 03:05:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.18] (helo=bilbo.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AAOfR-0000iw-Hq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 03:04:57 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.158.102]) by bilbo.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.7-GR) with ESMTP id BQU15712; Fri, 17 Oct 2003 09:04:51 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Alexander Pohoyda X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <874qy8khjk.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family> (message from Alexander Pohoyda on 16 Oct 2003 23:18:39 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:17200 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17200 > From: Alexander Pohoyda > Date: 16 Oct 2003 23:18:39 +0200 > > > > OK, this may not be that important. I just don't see a reason why do we > > > have to reformat the message just to ignore this reformatting later. > > > Reformatting only introduces an obstacle. Why to do that? > > > > I think it eases further processing elsewhere in RMAIL. > > Who may know that for sure? I'd say look in the sources, it's quite clear from that.