unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Spyros Roum <spyros.roum@posteo.net>
To: philipk@posteo.net
Cc: juri@linkov.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Add completion to compilation-read-command
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 15:44:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <962064f8-fab7-4867-af04-135e48a9dd15@posteo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ttas80au.fsf@posteo.net>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1784 bytes --]

Philip Kaludercic wrote:
>> To make sure I understand correctly, when using `completing-read` to
>> read user input, that is narrowing,
>> while the `C-x <up>` and *Completions* buffer is completion.
> No, `completing-read' just invokes an interface, that frontends can
> implement a UI for.  The default UI provides a completing/expanding
> interface, while Vertico, Helm, Ivy, etc. do selecting/narrowing.  When
> using `completing-read' you cannot really assume one or the other, so in
> effect one has to find a middle ground.  It is best you try your code in
> emacs -Q without any changes and see how it behaves.  Things like SPC
> doing something else than you would expect is just one pitfall, others
> I can recall are providing text that is difficult to input (I wrote a
> package a few years back called "insert-kaomoji" that used
> `completing-read' to prompt the user eastern-style emoticons; it is easy
> to use with a selecting framework, but more inconvenient if the user is
> first made to complete a string that is difficult to write, as most of
> the characters are not easy to type).

I tried the attached patch with `emacs -q` and now I understand how this 
would be very annoying without something like vertico installed haha. 
Nevertheless, it seems to work!

I'm attaching a patch based on the conversation so far to get feedback on.

I believe I should also write something to the NEWS file.

Also, I'm wondering if this counts as non-trivial enough that I would 
need to sign the FSF copyright.

Regarding testing, as far as I can tell, there are currently no tests 
for `compilation-read-command`.
Should I add anything? If yes, I'll probably need someone to point to 
existing tests for similar things that I can copy from.

Am I forgetting anything else?

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2502 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Add-option-for-making-compilation-read-command-use-c.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2018 bytes --]

From e1068206662913978d541f924205a0615f8d2d95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Spyros Roum <spyros.roum@posteo.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 17:32:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add option for making compilation-read-command use
 completing-read

---
 lisp/progmodes/compile.el | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/compile.el b/lisp/progmodes/compile.el
index 6784a12fd63..a318937e96d 100644
--- a/lisp/progmodes/compile.el
+++ b/lisp/progmodes/compile.el
@@ -1797,12 +1797,34 @@ compilation-mode-font-lock-keywords
    '((compilation--ensure-parse))
    compilation-mode-font-lock-keywords))
 
-(defun compilation-read-command (command)
+(defun compilation-prompt-read-shell-command (command)
   (read-shell-command "Compile command: " command
                       (if (equal (car compile-history) command)
                           '(compile-history . 1)
                         'compile-history)))
 
+(defun compilation-prompt-read-command-with-completion (command)
+  (completing-read "Compile command: " compile-history
+                   nil nil command
+                   (if (equal (car compile-history) command)
+                       '(compile-history . 1)
+                     'compile-history)))
+
+(defcustom compilation-read-command-function
+  'compilation-prompt-read-shell-command
+  "Function used by `compilation-read-command' to get user's input.
+Defaults to `compilation-prompt-read-shell-command',
+but `compilation-prompt-read-command-with-completion' can be used instead for
+a completing version based on past runs."
+  :version "31.0"
+  :type 'function
+  :options '(compilation-prompt-read-command-with-completion))
+
+(defun compilation-read-command (command)
+  "Prompt user for command to run.
+`compilation-read-command-function' controls the way input is read from the minibuffer."
+  (funcall compilation-read-command-function command))
+
 \f
 ;;;###autoload
 (defun compile (command &optional comint)
-- 
2.47.1


  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-25 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-24  8:53 Add completion to compilation-read-command Spyros Roum
2024-12-24 11:35 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-12-24 11:57   ` Spyros Roum
2024-12-24 12:53     ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-12-24 13:43       ` Spyros Roum
2024-12-24 14:53         ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-12-24 17:03     ` Juri Linkov
2024-12-24 18:36       ` Spyros Roum
2024-12-24 18:50         ` Juri Linkov
2024-12-24 18:59           ` Spyros Roum
2024-12-24 22:35             ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-12-25  7:27               ` Juri Linkov
2024-12-24 19:56           ` [External] : " Drew Adams
2024-12-25  7:29             ` Juri Linkov
2024-12-25 19:46               ` Drew Adams
2024-12-24 22:44         ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-12-25  8:26           ` Spyros Roum
2024-12-25 11:33             ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-12-25 15:44               ` Spyros Roum [this message]
2024-12-25 16:38                 ` Philip Kaludercic
2024-12-25 22:11                   ` Spyros Roum
2024-12-25 17:32                 ` Juri Linkov
2024-12-25 18:02                   ` Spyros Roum
2024-12-25 19:36               ` [External] : " Drew Adams
2024-12-24 19:27       ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=962064f8-fab7-4867-af04-135e48a9dd15@posteo.net \
    --to=spyros.roum@posteo.net \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=juri@linkov.net \
    --cc=philipk@posteo.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).