From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Felipe Lema Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Remote asynchronous processes Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 12:06:57 -0400 Message-ID: <960801a869da4cb37125a8c30ce99841af289cbd.camel@mortemale.org> References: <87a6zg0yss.fsf@gmx.de> <87eeomoasy.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37304"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Philipp Stephani , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 04 18:10:56 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k2zWi-0009YB-4x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 18:10:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40272 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2zWg-0005py-Sd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 12:10:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2zTA-0002KF-Bq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 12:07:16 -0400 Original-Received: from latitanza.investici.org ([82.94.249.234]:24725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2zT7-0005Ug-Qu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 12:07:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mx3.investici.org (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by latitanza.investici.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E16120275; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:07:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mortemale.org; s=stigmate; t=1596557221; bh=Ej+s8DFu3uWC21bIiwYWk5Ct5WAsqDsNMUqw3KpKCNk=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=q48eGvJQYUKZS3XsQ/X826GVWn9Mrqe7s5srhdVEZOzNP56jzvhsAWasB/smfsBnu 0VPI8sNsXL25y9KBW4LQc3YE9Mj1tHhDGaQ23iES2ORtLwj3y0kixrxOHteN5unvdA orzMS9DqwfjK/YCCaVv5aCRkFC171nOtv/9+Wq80= Original-Received: from [82.94.249.234] (mx3.investici.org [82.94.249.234]) (Authenticated sender: felipelema@mortemale.org) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 372A41201BE; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:06:59 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87eeomoasy.fsf@gmx.de> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=82.94.249.234; envelope-from=felipelema@mortemale.org; helo=latitanza.investici.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/04 12:07:01 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253437 Archived-At: whoah, cool... will definitely check it out Thanks Felipe On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 14:27 +0200, Michael Albinus wrote: > Michael Albinus writes: > > Hi Felipe, > > > > If this is not feasible, then I can manage with this "non-checks- > > > just- > > > run-this-command-as-is" approach. > > > > If integrated, it must be optional per connection. There might be > > remote > > hosts which could be treated this way; and other hosts which might > > not. > > Finally, I've committed a respective patch to Emacs master. Read the > Tramp manual (info "(tramp) Improving performance of asynchronous > remote processes") > about. > > > > Gards > > Best regards, Michael.