From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit-Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bat-mode: Inconsistent fontification. Consider using font-lock-function-name-face Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 16:32:18 -0400 Message-ID: <953bb433-a706-5fad-e85c-7ae1361a8840@gmail.com> References: <83ftl530zg.fsf@gnu.org> <83blvt2vdr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="124168"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 09 22:32:56 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i7QLG-000WB4-H1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 22:32:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60562 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i7QLE-0006fS-T9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 16:32:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57929) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i7QKk-0006fI-Ra for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 16:32:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7QKj-0000vp-RP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 16:32:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]:42357) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7QKj-0000vR-MH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 16:32:21 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id c9so17879611qth.9 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 13:32:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jyqdeKwgxt3zj5ZTyKRAHs8mUCY6yye9UHJdOw61mJw=; b=PClA74GyQ50NSlGOOQj+yxXLrNt3Lyz4r11dUHqfV6aaoGkWatusetxtTt/JsWLnkb 4AqASNf4tbjNkYTHxXMCIwNzafLubPyuUFzMmiYisnO+iW2rGz9g3nRpmlVzCNANhd1X BdCkz1T9wguzI2JbEoPISFLBay2rXutXy9YVaD1wDFOlFYARWZldDr0+jNNaNZoYM5QZ ctZ/tlOy3UPPST5rLNK8pJHQRcm3O1WNdzbkYHzxGz3AM4zE1DT0LYcCpxNCj/SCDse1 xKu9WqINqI59JytSVTdmtqDSwGxy6zoFYDQ7i7Dgl9JuArGuEY5tIsXJujZIlY0CDqXO yJwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jyqdeKwgxt3zj5ZTyKRAHs8mUCY6yye9UHJdOw61mJw=; b=imV9Gvie9aGO8WtyN+TZRQU43rLwGt2cF9wwgaFO8sxprsrHP98uZNwtckPy+M6UFr Po2VxJ1DcZItAizaOUMjrxP7Edn0KfOvClSvMnnoIPHOqc0K8IysWDVSJuh7moh7xjnf mITl17FlDmr6Ba684029Xib4DaWHD/3xshCRpDsXurnG5D/KRhNk1kETUhcVl+9PyaS5 y2sVokJSh2Dir1U9C7RtCMNuMblflAp/6Hlcd+CokLY4I61hztkJAIuaFYUcM3mHR90Y DdjSLnVjNFk7nACwXq7c1fr1SlIYzWIx771A5EvTQXaLSm8cdxcKgYXLoQlLva8XHGkq eEUA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVa3Tk+O0D47rhLs2j13IzQw9Xm/zhupqelmtVmGrYGdJrkvlvH MiqA5/YL81q9/xyG232qtPIfCGil X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzezvIx/q/ii7QHG5Etx7tAh1dpyVRf8j9LZhG1O2ZK+okWQVfpXhS+31ycXHeKJWduvXnH0g== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:544e:: with SMTP id d14mr13874351qtq.100.1568061140218; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 13:32:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?IPv6:2603:400a:0:82c:fff0:4e82:4e43:cc9e? ([2603:400a:0:82c:fff0:4e82:4e43:cc9e]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n17sm8562660qke.103.2019.09.09.13.32.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Sep 2019 13:32:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::830 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:239966 Archived-At: On 2019-09-09 15:26, Jostein Kjønigsen wrote: >>> Would that be a better option? >> I don't know, I never felt the need to distinguish them. FWIW, I like the idea of adding extra font-lock faces. At the moment many more define their own custom faces and they often don't have a good candidate to inherit from, leading to inconsistent rendering between mores.