From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 22:02:25 +0300 Message-ID: <9471c28f-8eae-b555-ee86-9fffd6229937@yandex.ru> References: <87h7fcnmq0.fsf@posteo.net> <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> <83y28mp0rb.fsf@gnu.org> <51a363db-fde7-791d-cf8d-98ac601d62ee@yandex.ru> <57ca4d78-2339-201d-edce-678c9b003a99@yandex.ru> <83bl5dsh8b.fsf@gnu.org> <8335qps8vs.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27999"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, danflscr@gmail.com, philipk@posteo.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: rms@gnu.org, John Yates Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 02 21:03:56 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mLs0B-00075C-MD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 21:03:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36662 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLs0A-0004Nx-B8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 15:03:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48646) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLryt-0003Ev-Gh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 15:02:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::334]:53168) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLryp-0003Fe-ND; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 15:02:35 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id e26so1986053wmk.2; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:02:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=X5IOv9iTHMJmKPp59FJHDM+x7kibx5xxyaEmtYN8jFo=; b=NO7+tcqaZAxdv7U6p5ysdb32G/rd2CYaCgzZclQ1x3/ERiAnEZPePhcDq6JDCa1sjY FefeOSTX+c8FbeD/OzkOjvB6n7S6BwgFTyMH1RFS58vtNIDHk0ZzRtX1UhN4FDlYV9Vs hIgflWEgdByWgb33TA4oQGOUDrJlSOHM9BgW1BWtqGuA5Jv1nR9kOatjWILxPhdK9jO9 UP6fozXRfmJCm2AlzsGtN7gk6Q1h3/mVJ6gShFUAmc508DHosgh5bAhfmN3qQiufYHdc zQKisBqGOLmyfXf5D9zOnEOECKj0kS7r9Wp92IDCxEtoV1ioaXO85JBJ8G63PHnjrF0n OwHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=X5IOv9iTHMJmKPp59FJHDM+x7kibx5xxyaEmtYN8jFo=; b=IKEvd0RkDMl4Lhi/Roryl9LkFpfLgDBt48OUb5oCGx5q9iI4NYY9ECQNHf1G6iSsFY 2rooMhLbuXy76cy6MGHjAhghbpHzjexLDEdnWpqY0MzUJ5RAWc0tVLWpOAy7TN+gUMti DI1sjWorP4kNubcBfd6/Ngb5d+JYMwxqMz6y/8fQbH8dkUGobcoxNqoGRCD7E2rD9Cgf Ox4h8M6zAfrv9560RtN57RYxuzD/FCDQmDoYr5Oz6wHNGka5g0WdvN7xY7HowgXEvcYl mFcdF5RTL8af3/34J39BQKJSS+KVJve0LB7hY2Fwj4tP5yIJcnbkqmSIFnycZsX3dsoh v6ww== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532oq7n69InxHNbqbcow+xuXNPWV5giFFcv+dVIVrjZIP0Jm7nPK LmHbtkDZQM2zDGpd99slrYkpqclcgOM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNMopqmynHVhurcwXE/mJMpT7x+bmuwPSOeS7V49uhzKxvd8IW4w5+IoSxQqrFLju2TbLW7A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:a44:: with SMTP id c4mr4599693wmq.83.1630609348109; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c1sm2350191wml.33.2021.09.02.12.02.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:02:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::334; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x334.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -36 X-Spam_score: -3.7 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.225, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273725 Archived-At: On 02.09.2021 06:38, Richard Stallman wrote: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > > Ah, but the model is opt-in to change, not opt-out. Thus > > opponents of change start off with an advantage > > That's ok. We don't have any obligation to be "fair" to > wishes for changes that other users don't like. We're literally under no "obligation" to anything. But is it a good outcome? Under the current system a sufficiently loud single user can effectively veto any change. Or at least 3-4 such users. But even 5 or 10 users are in no way representative of our entire user base.