From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f56408a: * lisp/progmodes/xref.el (xref-pop-marker-stack): Don't obsolete. Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:35:41 +0300 Message-ID: <936d9d26-4d94-53db-bb77-7463b8147864@yandex.ru> References: <20211026081718.30075.27468@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20211026081719.E1D3721011@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <9806D073-4E56-4616-9C94-3F45513E5FE7@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30307"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=c3=a5rd?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 26 11:37:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfIu7-0007es-B2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:37:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43260 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfIu6-0003kj-0t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 05:37:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41312) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfIs2-0002xp-6k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 05:35:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::229]:34756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfIrx-0000zI-Kl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 05:35:47 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id h11so6285369ljk.1 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 02:35:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hCcM2TdqoAcvvfaDodi6+/amZpDfq/488Z7d/dFiMgU=; b=lJG+2zSqK+dMJyLBKa9YfsVzFhYI4EDI5goppcFb7qJTyXN2VF++BUNz4eaeY1AA5B X6I3FCTugfJZmSQV03MI9Lmy4VfmI0UvVbsAqKxXbdmTQuLr5vzG7L9pzBOKWVZM3C62 a+5TkZOiQH+onSN/MSiOnM6sdUZMY+xU44ZOqR/S+RGXR8FbC+gQI6EtDtspGn82ujOn 2O4R11y29RCSUnmZzd+NQwi67O8IzkjgLRnjgcnthDBx0szaijliirB3shbsnXeVm84P YmMu93Cs/ZfH0WP7H4wrCFj/EwgTagM+jY35i0xpRm8FPpa58A5HJKYh2QFiUaFMHXz4 ChAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hCcM2TdqoAcvvfaDodi6+/amZpDfq/488Z7d/dFiMgU=; b=A6RCPMfH6mzHyUyI7j8GaYv1lfEEBF7BiBZVOElk3IYZ48NM+QhfBT3Rxlj3+5yK8T kXjr+VLj3WXLTEfW2FizylvIdh1hoQa+1FUX0EauzPgZXEwIGDtf/61ck6V/p4A8vw7L 3vrLcOo6ftpwz6xb7IdiIi1/zF+f967sVnhKsaldReuADOV++48e/t4SyVPjSWoEWzW3 wFX5DyYnH3mZmBg4ypjXv5FRybHbSUXPVGYfNKQxplVdFspFNnjDLdvk4R2/FWVYssbx btpdl71TM6kmpDj+sOM3Tab9svr26pi7qJd3YiYQzLG4u2TIBtafe/KRAMjWRFcZxwG5 5TBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531hgCfvvcI4pQbjEksHcJmmTy4uBcxwElOV6V4Fuj5Xm9XfJTRB 39IX9A7kslhTj98AUANOnDOy8/W6OdY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwcs6OVE+wNmqrJWOeoZJ/+n1LRbKVqinRnDivnkWKzyXn7RcHB5Khjy2i8qBgcukoKivwdQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8687:: with SMTP id l7mr25591567lji.263.1635240942993; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 02:35:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.103] ([5.18.248.29]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o5sm1882428lft.278.2021.10.26.02.35.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Oct 2021 02:35:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9806D073-4E56-4616-9C94-3F45513E5FE7@acm.org> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::229; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x229.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.846, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277829 Archived-At: On 26.10.2021 11:56, Mattias Engdegård wrote: > It felt small-minded to generate obsoletion warnings for external packages that now have to make their code uglier in order to avoid that if they are particulate about a clean CI, especially if they compile with byte-compile-error-on-warn (which I often do). > > The warning doesn't tell them anything useful; the semantics haven't changed. This is in contrast to the variables made obsolete. > > Does this reasoning make sense? I could revert the change. I don't have a strong opinion about it, but that's how we usually do renames: without changing semantics, mark the previous name as obsolete. I suppose the alternative is to wait for ~6 years until it's reasonable to drop support for Emacs 28 in third-party code? And then mark it obsolete?