From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: :alnum: broken? Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:05:00 +0100 Message-ID: <928D71AD-B8CB-426C-862D-DBD7C7B162C2@acm.org> References: <86wo8flqct.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86sgj3ljf0.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <5fecc0e1-1ee2-5a89-9297-b0b9aa4a8e9c@cs.ucla.edu> <03A37C4B-9FE8-4A25-9851-79BC8265455E@acm.org> <1FF46F18-30B2-430B-835E-18EB17C6DB87@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="31130"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Paul Eggert , Stephen Leake , emacs-devel To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 27 19:06:30 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j7NYL-00080X-LQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 19:06:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36004 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j7NYK-0007pc-1O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:06:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59069) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j7NXC-0007Db-Sf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:05:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7NXB-0001Xr-Fw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:05:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mail228c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.10.238]:45582 helo=mail36c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7NXA-0001Wd-Vb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:05:17 -0500 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1582826704; bh=x7ewNykkMwfEYkPEjmtUAkNiLxF7/Frf85ooTg1fnyI=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=LB3rhE5U7VTJO7FhHzvZK4P3Of9l1sT+GI9lKOVw8xnwCF51ArF5DFWn+tNmTSIV4 060jSTgGANpXnHaYuVjz8TjtQ7i/Ivjwl5EPbPNTNnmFAOoAlbWeIYvCQj5OS2O4hF pkYW6GWHbCusYNt9oVjuInuh1KPvCToxCTmywW4I= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from [192.168.0.4] (c188-150-171-71.bredband.comhem.se [188.150.171.71]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail36c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 01RI50OB011897; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:05:02 +0000 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A782F1E.5E5804CE.0025, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=bd8Vr9HB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:117 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=M51BFTxLslgA:10 a=Upj08SVRuEOEz-9S3ogA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-Received-From: 91.136.10.238 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245090 Archived-At: 27 feb. 2020 kl. 09.43 skrev Andreas Schwab : > Right, I missed the break. But I think this is too strict, it should > not reject "[:a-z$%&/()=3D:]' Thank you, and with the later committed addendum that example is = accepted as well. The code still rejects "[:az$%&/()=3D:]" (no hyphen) = but so does GNU grep. Perhaps we could restrict the filter to letters = between the colons; I'm open for suggestions. The point is moot now, of course, as the changes have been reverted = altogether.