From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Info enhancements Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:37:01 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <9178-Wed10Dec2003093701+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> References: <200312070059.hB70xfF02497@f7.net> <9681-Sun07Dec2003074722+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <200312071342.hB7Dgx811013@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87ptez38o7.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1071042040 6813 80.91.224.253 (10 Dec 2003 07:40:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 07:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, karl@freefriends.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 10 08:40:35 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ATyxX-0001o9-00 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:40:35 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1ATyxX-0002jS-00 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:40:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ATzuK-00080q-Lq for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 03:41:20 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1ATztK-0007fX-SY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 03:40:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1ATzsm-00075n-Io for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 03:40:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.114.186.23] (helo=aragorn.inter.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1ATzsm-00075g-2G; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 03:39:44 -0500 Original-Received: from zaretski ([80.230.154.120]) by aragorn.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.8-GR) with ESMTP id CAW29220; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:38:14 +0200 (IST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:48:31 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:18611 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:18611 > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:48:31 -0500 > > If we conclude that we must leave it off by default, in effect > we are concluding it is a failure. I'm not sure this is always so. Some newly introduced options are deliberately left off by default to avoid drastic changes in the default behavior (that would surprise users) or if we are uncertain whether users will like them. So I don't think every option that's off by default means a failure.