Am 22.09.2006 um 03:06 schrieb Kenichi Handa: > In article <4CEE7BA9-0CEF-40CD-A081-2C707A44833B@web.de>, Peter > Dyballa writes: > >> OK, you're right: it really works better now, I had made some >> mistake! I wonder whether I picked up the characters with C-s C-w ... >> As you wrote, this won't work. > > It didn't work, but should work now. I attached 3 files > (temp1,2,7 encoded in iso-8859-1,2,7 respectively). > C-x C-f temp1 RET ESC < C-n C-s C-w C-x C-f temp2 C-s C-s > should find " á", and > C-x C-f temp1 RET ESC < C-n C-n C-s C-w C-x C-f temp7 C-s C-s > should find " °". Yes, I can confirm: it works! It works also in my own test files – except one: the ISO 8859-6 encoded one. I was searching for HYPHEN- MINUS, U+00AD. I'll attach my test file. It could be also useful in the ISO 8859-6 possible bug I reported recently. > >> Anyway, what also does not work is: C-s C-q > greater 177 octal code>. For those with really small keyboards this >> is the (almost?) only chance to find some of the x times 64 K >> characters in Unicode ... > > This should work now too. For instance, " " and "á" are > 0255 and 0341 in iso-8859-1 charset. So, if your primary > charset is iso-8859-1, C-q 255 C-q 341 RET should input > " á". And, > C-x C-f temp2 ESC < C-s C-q 255 C-q 341 RET > should find " á" even if the characters in that buffer is > from iso-8859-2. > I did not try this test because it is too simple: LATIN SMALL LETTER A WITH ACUTE (U+00E1) is in the two encodings on 341/225/E1. Please use my answer to Miles Bader as test case! I can send you my other ISO 8859-X test files. -- Greetings Pete "Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where's it going to end?" - Tom Stoppard