From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 23:05:20 +0000 Message-ID: <9088e12cb381e11e6d32@heytings.org> References: <831ba60af0cbfdd95686@heytings.org> <87mtuxj8ue.fsf@gnus.org> <9088e12cb3169cdcdbc4@heytings.org> <9088e12cb3a70cbf66aa@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6873"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 00:06:23 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lO79L-0001fB-Dn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 00:06:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35020 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lO79K-0003Gk-Er for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 19:06:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lO78P-0002oU-21 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 19:05:25 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:39818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lO78N-0004tb-D4; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 19:05:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1616367920; bh=XyWzqUU7F7hzmpP3P3AS55tHi+34RwMQ5Oj+ecWQIV4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=b52HFzFfIUIqz8IOixrzAMhTHs+l/zWEVo43tak/VcWHgMS3FxXwJY8Twga9GV3iz kxe5QSxJfxsi9/dcnUH4gkq4Yo8gP79Z17JPu3cJEGvubyuEehaUpiJDC1bYdA9Lcu wMe8W3+Ow5DRklARg90tFJAsr+BeAlo/8R6j79o0V+pNvaFcxhsLe7NLMTw3Qx9ama JX6/2g4F64Bi4BS17wgPe6dn79mO6XQub7/6fTJNMENiKtZe6eBFHzFPUxiLMIHw3e 5g2k+tx5gIdMRySPAIdPFX9RyKBa6A+/KfKKsYVmMaIoI8LpHm9sBJUQutUOc5en2x pwsGLWW+cZ1Gg== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266727 Archived-At: > > It isn't a small change to remove a feature completely. When asked to > keep _a_ binding, it has been meet with silence and it has been more > important to inconvinence users than to listen to them, so I can only > assume that this will a similar case for C-o. > Your assumption is wrong. Please have a look at the proposed experiment: it moves open-line to repeated C-o.