From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 13:20:54 +0000 Message-ID: <9088e12cb3169cdcdbc4@heytings.org> References: <831ba60af0cbfdd95686@heytings.org> <87mtuxj8ue.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14484"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 21 14:21:41 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lNy1T-0003g2-ME for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 14:21:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40676 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNy1S-0005lF-K4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 09:21:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48684) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNy0o-0004oD-9f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 09:20:58 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:39220) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lNy0m-0008Iu-Sm; Sun, 21 Mar 2021 09:20:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1616332855; bh=uZuVhNUNUlSKrkefUdqXIAp/nSOVbQ8ixma+5l5us+0=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=BMyjWoXnGl3x4XzAf3B/IRjz9uzY0OuanzZMraYVFDHt1h1exoMROPiZ3Zhpt/+ua i68d/pzDzSe4kvrR84h9BkoG+EDw8rL4Oduwn7IcH9vpwaXP2dXGKhVgGMkhyk3cIz ybm6iJeeVmEiUzmsrO5PQLfjJm009iBXW0bjg83XqBQXfNvPS5DovQSwIIzL2Gn3Ap DGt4FJjo1Ne+2MS28uDFSJh3ME6lY5bC8eDbcLjjNTWXvTucr/Rc/0ho03USf5NTtq tA02YdLQn9dWhf4MUO518+B+wNzZXqjS8PuTz7/Gk+okyNah4stNvt2IQWjHLB/r7s cFp/Eq5aXwfug== In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266704 Archived-At: > > I think there was less negative feedback about C-o than about removing > M-o M-s and friends. Yet that was removed, and not even moved to > another binding -- indeed, rather calls for keeping at least some where > promptly ignored. > Don't worry, they are not ignored, but it is not possible to do everything in one go.