From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Reitter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: html-mode demanding a bit too tight Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 15:11:16 +0100 Message-ID: <90571B41-7207-441B-AF52-968B2F1BDF7C@gmail.com> References: <87647ooxwm.fsf@zip.com.au> <462CC030.8030203@gmail.com> <87mz0y8vyk.fsf@zip.com.au> <4631DB16.6030408@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177683091 25279 80.91.229.12 (27 Apr 2007 14:11:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 27 16:11:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HhRAV-0006XW-PH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 16:11:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhRGM-0005rz-Af for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:17:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HhRGI-0005rt-Je for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:17:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HhRGH-0005rg-1A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:17:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhRGG-0005rd-S9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:17:24 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.230]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HhRAP-0006ZH-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:11:21 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s17so925105wxc for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:11:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=nRjollagm327YiX8VfMvspIJjp9kaoj6N9Zdam5nApLWCV5NvqHOlRW0WonTquiLMUipCDZl7BDvqdVbAR4K85W1mcpdyKKKui6kgSne8rvqmTu1/PVcXUH60m5PbQQ2jPhFWiFtbDiuikHqXmSeTBYnNKtniXv/J2nZVdJX2H4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:message-id:cc:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to:x-mailer; b=apNtedSmy2DMQJyvtm6AQl5R2oAdZ4CXvwbADWMwxLVDNOXwyFPxPxmeAxCGyIJCZWzifNTAaKGsQrw6Nm8HlztP3W/l5WJoH3NABon+EIuGQOhzQwc7YJWeg0Hpo8ae0UyyVz0xUIpDspqeOAMfyh/9ts6fJ58fgh2hOhKU104= Original-Received: by 10.90.102.20 with SMTP id z20mr3439262agb.1177683079398; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?129.215.174.81? ( [129.215.174.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u1sm32913uge.2007.04.27.07.11.17; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:11:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70260 Archived-At: On 27 Apr 2007, at 13:48, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > That is because, Lennart, you don't care for the release at all. You > are using the CVS code, lobby others to use the binaries you prepare > from CVS, and therefore an officially released version of Emacs has no > real value to you. Why care about it, if there's always tomorrow's > CVS? Even though I am keeping busy preparing binaries for others, I can only say that I agree with you and David K.: Please, stop checking in stuff and release 22.1 after the next pretest build. Because my releases are heavily patched and customized, nothing is more annoying than to work with the CVS head. I've been shooting at a moving target for two years now. A release would be in many people's interests. I've got a number of bugs that I've reported, and I even wrote patches for them which did not get checked in. I'm not pursuing it because I'd like to see a release!