From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Broken lisp/Makefile.w32-in Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 19:59:58 +0300 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <9003-Sun01Sep2002195958+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <20020831201438.49D3.LEKTU@terra.es> <20020901165341.39BF.LEKTU@terra.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030899496 7415 127.0.0.1 (1 Sep 2002 16:58:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 16:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17lY3D-0001vK-00 for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 18:58:15 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17lYb2-0003To-00 for ; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 19:33:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17lY4h-0006rY-00; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 12:59:47 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17lY3b-0006oR-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 12:58:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17lY3U-0006nu-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 12:58:38 -0400 Original-Received: from frigg.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.16]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17lY3U-0006no-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 12:58:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by frigg.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.58-GA) with ESMTP id BSI53025; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 19:58:07 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: lektu@terra.es X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-Reply-To: <20020901165341.39BF.LEKTU@terra.es> (message from Juanma Barranquero on Sun, 01 Sep 2002 16:58:17 -0300) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:7277 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:7277 > Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 16:58:17 -0300 > From: Juanma Barranquero > > Ahem, what you see is that in one case every string output by the echo > goes to the file, while in the second case only the first string goes to > the file; the others go directly to the standard output. Ah, sorry, I wasn't aware of that (you didn't show the file created by the command, so I was confused). Does it help to put the redirection at the beginning of the command, like below? >> foo.txt for ... (yes, it's a valid syntax for COMMAND.COM and CMD.EXE).