From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags name collision. Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:49:52 +0300 Message-ID: <8f5db4aa-dbfa-a877-2205-e4c67ac81445@yandex.ru> References: <83pmln69n0.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411135259.zqrlngj6lmpgbsni@Ergus> <83ilrf6779.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411142519.vnbr63lfpyuqpw2w@Ergus> <20220412104823.xfquehpmoghektkt@Ergus> <20220412164016.y3qbycbbf5gwujuy@Ergus> <20220412174848.ftsa5q6sfkilzk6q@Ergus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35273"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Alfred M. Szmidt" , Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 12 23:01:01 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1neNdE-0008za-R8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 23:01:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55472 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neNdD-0007Et-P6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 17:00:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48288) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neNSZ-0004wt-Kh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 16:49:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::636]:46965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neNSX-0002dE-Vp; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 16:49:59 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id t11so12708049eju.13; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 13:49:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jzSzcuhBp8Xh03qrKsW7eRV8ehXexawb2tDvAOGI5XI=; b=cBqFnEIGlBgPTLF7a9EI8dArUgunn7uDCMVwgvKMYh72QWXz6zLuUJLKuW7JYhyv5g oyKSjtjkTyPm8TeY9ua1QBynQmALqbO2iDIkkKImes4w0muTxWRkcBxt+p+mEjdQCZTP lNdgL3lzxc1/ZbVKhAX1uGItnhgDH2b9v1F696nu7/IjMzwkrWpeC9DEd7Yuty7uXRl4 Z7x/aapxCuk29p+A1dXrVTXqpoleme6stR9JRyRElhFWMBbmjp2GvVu6jInT0m30nUJH k9ZMzkELBFva4crXaoPGpPscknedVQAKPbwXu4C6qAmI6EXLPDx52MzJe4oHBQDoLRvO JFAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jzSzcuhBp8Xh03qrKsW7eRV8ehXexawb2tDvAOGI5XI=; b=Z7TA9/frVAfLnAP76mIS465fzKxtrMrplTeJSuQIkwoHOuJyIDB5Uh/ZRQI/IbTjSG IMUy8D/n3uVe8ndBT0Uusjj+5B/HBM00ix2MbVDKqVO7a6o5yvsYddDkTCGAdyS7OEeF TsExjJ9uh3czWxLzVIcw6hWA5vfCLW0xa0z+F07OSostfr9ZasYXl1+gXaiM0OIMXPlB VaoIkI2bVXhe7aO5FuPpTztUXufoyFPSj60R+dw9xCjJzTXvaTvW7o9pyTEgYgEWTAWp M8AVdaWr+yRqs3fVAq7w+eokrk8kfDU+bvr4wmCm3gA8iiAlAcfRGhctUYxByMemaYqx JbRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531IBOW53yC5bc0kUtD0U34D0Y51CSwYm43o0EtsOz2861hxU7rZ OjZw+8TO1tjAQk5oQRaui5uRdb6BA6vRFw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmq4aXKMaf6pCZBQvOVfFTqPIO0iH2U/VcF9tb0Fp5MMDuBW+PfY6RUANyWFwvkKiPchYgCQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3e0a:b0:6e8:8d91:48bb with SMTP id hp10-20020a1709073e0a00b006e88d9148bbmr11662844ejc.237.1649796595252; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 13:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.236.48] ([173.237.64.48]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a1-20020a1709063e8100b006ce06ed8aa7sm13594852ejj.142.2022.04.12.13.49.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Apr 2022 13:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::636; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x636.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288341 Archived-At: On 12.04.2022 22:50, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > >where Exuberant (and Universal) ctags outputs: > > > > syms_of_cmds cmds.c /^syms_of_cmds (void)$/;" f typeref:typename:void > > Did you tried the format=1 option? > > No, it is not supported by POSIX -- that is sorta the point of using > standard-ish compliant utilities. What's the point, though? I can understand trying to support a standard format, but for programs...? Would you also standardize Emacs and avoid adding new features because of that?