From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 15:55:25 +0300 Message-ID: <8ecc8848-373b-077e-dba5-63884632760f@yandex.ru> References: <87h7fcnmq0.fsf@posteo.net> <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> <83y28mp0rb.fsf@gnu.org> <51a363db-fde7-791d-cf8d-98ac601d62ee@yandex.ru> <57ca4d78-2339-201d-edce-678c9b003a99@yandex.ru> <01341bd6-b94b-4f94-1461-405e723142ad@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32041"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Cc: philipk@posteo.net, danflscr@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, lokedhs@gmail.com, Stefan Kangas , emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, eliz@gnu.org To: Arthur Miller Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 07 15:16:46 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mNaxx-000865-Td for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 15:16:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47496 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNaxw-0003ZJ-KL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:16:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53106) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNadS-0006U4-Gv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 08:55:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::436]:39485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNadQ-0002km-0E; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 08:55:34 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id z4so14278921wrr.6; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 05:55:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wkSO/w6PmYqV6m4v0bWiVQnZxHb5FGgLJT3aJw+s7Bw=; b=DKhk0L+QSUXcfPqFtBxnkwvL3u9pyEwqqASc8NDfXwzJivnJnUXu9UeQZFPjODNSxW QYUP7P1A5R1NA2b0HBP2dPbh/GEPgppYGTOthNowK2c0vVPRDrWtQ9a4Fv83oXbyQJfT jEnjhi/mitxm19UHVAkBbsLrN96fz8gKsNOuRzo7d+M9XOPtveiHFJT5DA7woTpFZ1tX t+LNjgocBD0N4UimHHxuiQ9xWAl6Pr3Z0CYARSERRwMvPnQEZnqzEMCVdDYALttAeroI SoceS9bwYe4ps8xqLud8ARTv1QH6vD+YyV82yWwOuFnmB+Wq7EcgvCv7JlZnvmOoB+aB K84w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wkSO/w6PmYqV6m4v0bWiVQnZxHb5FGgLJT3aJw+s7Bw=; b=pjCpfbG+Ic9ErUq+H+/26WZtor4Z9eUGYbao8bZktFW12Ug+QF/zIQwiETyCPg9EdB pz/kSYvriPlgPJDa7ib8omUvoR/HVMHfZqYVBFWGkkBth9gavzl+jpUwgL/RkyKtWEzA nvctumscZSJTwks/tcnnWZercVQuP23zCGvyOwPHY3WAjtGxCepH5srLNuQmUCQAote1 t+jFjZev2SGtH64YXp84P5g9u2j5zyyi8FK6aYCn8p2dSqwnL0+6GTFD9rPcRCKoip3F NVt/WmyhY9OIhjCYU/GG46gtuSTTzJNeDk9P2viBr+ZQZ418iNY6ItzONTgKUlywJRbA vmCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532223MlQYcOlWxDLJ/y49uCZEF9ixTi3JmHHTGT4g1pQXFjZebU AZMSwsSJ8VcCmxPNwKeuwpF49j9womQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8orJyRgBOf4b34D3+gGO3a3zNkgUo8NC4JOZGOCB5YslehBtoUs3lLQEAU2G3WDaW5DebWQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:b741:: with SMTP id n1mr19185556wre.354.1631019328421; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 05:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c13sm10971851wru.73.2021.09.07.05.55.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Sep 2021 05:55:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::436; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x436.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -37 X-Spam_score: -3.8 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.332, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:274233 Archived-At: On 07.09.2021 15:49, Arthur Miller wrote: > Dmitry Gutov writes: > >> On 07.09.2021 07:56, Arthur Miller wrote: >>> Introduce an extra prefix: C-v? And put undo on C-v u, and windmove undo on C-v U?:) >>> V is next to c, so all prefixes follow next to each other x,c and v. >> I think the current subthread is about adding 'redo' to the default bindings >> set. That would mean not touching the existing bindings, much less the important >> ones. > Are there any kyes left to add anything new? Adding new prefix to defaults opens > for entire new setup. Maybe some hard to hit key combos could be also rebound to > something easier on new prefix. Yes scroll would have to be rebound, but is it > whole world. You give something to win much more. I would be totally fine with 'undo-redo' being bound to 'C-?', 'M-_' and possibly 'C-x U'. At least as the first step. If we try to increase the scope of the changes, the odds of anything happening at all will get much slimmer.