From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "David De La Harpe Golden" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacsclient bug Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 00:10:25 +0000 Message-ID: <8e24944a0802021610v7f9e22ebv22c9403556f37b40@mail.gmail.com> References: <200801271541.m0RFfGE6016267@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201997441 25118 80.91.229.12 (3 Feb 2008 00:10:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 00:10:41 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 03 01:11:02 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JLSRp-0005CQ-89 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2008 01:11:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JLSRN-0004i5-Fq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:10:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JLSRJ-0004gj-Ft for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:10:29 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JLSRI-0004et-F2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:10:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JLSRI-0004el-BZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:10:28 -0500 Original-Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.179]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JLSRI-0006Mw-1z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:10:28 -0500 Original-Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so1784281pyb.1 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:10:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=HGsMU2z4uHMANdQcFTS57FwVMBhF3zhvHuMbVlzr84U=; b=YeWmkGTSmLttw26BbkxR0ABqD+XxxU3bSzoyhVMOiHisIr8S2CyiY6Ktoeq4CFXCvvs7p75gSzJN0bsBzqlaTca/OhmcMpOjIT8cTEJzYD7xSgts+bJ7zZquFLqGIMEEwsE9afh7AJmqa7XzBTsE8PoIbx1ANoREAy12SulgL+4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ohx7L0+8SHjh+UE4xyIie0uSHJa7Y5SKLi0nxSoaShmM4MlxjeZvExqR3wEPCYU7oEiq6IzqfIGqFyDbfz1lXPoJ3D65iWJOaEjZE9/5WBPSCfpvC1HKmdrvr9OROxmnunromghmkJcFwYEV8txs8cG3ee0d94l1DO5bd3dVoQY= Original-Received: by 10.142.157.15 with SMTP id f15mr2922267wfe.16.1201997425630; Sat, 02 Feb 2008 16:10:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.142.111.4 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:10:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88069 Archived-At: On 31/01/2008, Sascha Wilde wrote: > This stopped working with the new emacsclient version and `-d $DISPLAY > -c $f' doesn't help, because there is no shell involved which could > expand $DISPLAY. > But does it it still exist in the process' environment? Maybe emacsclient now just needs a -D option for "use X11 display found in DISPLAY env var" ? So you can do "emacsclient -D -c", say. If you set the ViewSourceWith editor to dumpenv, where dumpenv is shell script #!/bin/sh env >/tmp/myenv , what does myenv end up containing? Does it have a DISPLAY or is firefox cleaning the env of its children?