From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Finding the dump Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:02:51 -0800 Message-ID: <8d219dad-5f90-f231-75c8-04a22db0f36d@dancol.org> References: <83munr8jb1.fsf@gnu.org> <838szb8ey9.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0oj62bc.fsf@gnu.org> <87ef8z4g1m.fsf@igel.home> <838sz75u7p.fsf@gnu.org> <877eer4e4x.fsf@igel.home> <835zub5p3i.fsf@gnu.org> <8736pf408v.fsf@igel.home> <83womq3z5c.fsf@gnu.org> <871s4yxfvb.fsf@igel.home> <83o9823xcq.fsf@gnu.org> <87womqvyy4.fsf@igel.home> <4f30b2b598e71d2c6ad766a3da8e4a33.squirrel@dancol.org> <87o982vszn.fsf@igel.home> <87k1ipx3jq.fsf@igel.home> <87bm41wzmv.fsf@igel.home> <837eep4fkj.fsf@gnu.org> <47a6df84-35b1-a85c-44be-5cec033e9255@cs.ucla.edu> <834l9s4wx4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="240920"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 28 17:31:41 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1go9oy-0010Tv-PY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 17:31:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34676 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1go9ox-0005i0-Nw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:31:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34491) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1go9NE-0007mD-RQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:03:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1go9NE-0001vT-1S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:03:00 -0500 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:54908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1go9ND-0001rC-5S; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:02:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject; bh=hdWrydVyFi0j09BXHSZ+GUf60vUMmFDJfzUetqgp3sk=; b=N/dT0cGgWdnehuIHXJytkOf/yqZtKO/xSunRzKPVnQj8l4wSErCzLibnmj+JQDd31iVQyD5UarJ5vzhhJyxw70VgUrxbBcBZNfXT914o3AqKJbc8+aH2UnqmPabLDxWAqQROS+w/5LKYVe5kLM7oUFltuzG2AsImZOpHsZ/xURNA1k+IDbjWlkE028BWQWkZZBJvQoNdGMMnb3g2zwux285jUn1KMJxF7cQxgS9IZHCaTYNdoI/09bkhxn3lWUSlSi58swXHy/ttcBGAS/fQ10uT7WqpgYCKZ/pnAbbfqv8jOSUOcnDSXpXnD6BSx4mB3Yyy5sjUe6gOI1GRRFklkA==; Original-Received: from [2604:4080:1321:9a00:f455:12b4:e650:5d75] by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1go9NA-0006e4-Ni; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 08:02:56 -0800 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:232767 Archived-At: On 1/28/19 7:57 AM, Paul Eggert wrote: > On 1/28/19 7:35 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Based on that experience, we might >> find good reasons to make some radical changes > > I wasn't thinking of making any significant change to how pdumper works. > I was thinking only of another mechanism, in *addition* to pdumper. This > mechanism would make startup faster and installation/operation a bit > less of a hassle. People could still use pdumper even with an Emacs > built with the new mechanism. Where would this performance benefit come from? The overhead of opening a file in libexec is negligible.