From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 11:07:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8c9c6ad7-7905-4b20-b501-e4e417882ef2@default> References: <831ro2tqqx.fsf@gnu.org> <4a1fd3f4-df92-c756-9874-4d07b54148ac@yandex.ru> <3bd09dca-dcdc-7569-e5fb-f6b53397af9d@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="33638"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , Richard Stallman , emacs-devel To: Dmitry Gutov , =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 02 20:10:21 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jUwaj-0008dx-Cq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 20:10:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36578 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUwai-0007b3-Fg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 14:10:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUwYY-0004Zr-HL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 14:08:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUwYX-0000sN-Rp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 14:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2120.oracle.com ([156.151.31.85]:51572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUwYW-0000rY-9s; Sat, 02 May 2020 14:08:04 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 042I81hA062793; Sat, 2 May 2020 18:08:01 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=kB+k8V0tRZ8bAbJyWjOnsXQBjeysV5SpXHND1KJODZg=; b=v4CA38by1LyUi1/WE5947XILPweHSGcD5DRm5uIMAxmPt7qwPB/pmhHITIaiHbNg2DDV AcfZOzJqOlUBXVFfcwF3+7kV7l+MwojtyVzqEY9Vl9QIZ/+RXPcr65up1MT8IfemqS95 DXnrXiwvcFo7Ws0lKODRBaNYioJJZL0U3KGLwSPfRdJaotokDGdLp5tBgmYDIgd/aWtj yq+DDpmunNYzsnUK1V/QCI8Eg7V1DZB+NkDHfXox/Jw7cfwm+MzRpm/X12vKUVsBs0ew 4SMOvMLGXhhIvljUfhR7Tfo5SWTQPn+ss16bzl+9QBCA63ZJsZuOiNZhXi0PRQuNs3K4 Wg== Original-Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by userp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 30s1gmsfgj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 02 May 2020 18:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 042I6ha1116073; Sat, 2 May 2020 18:08:00 GMT Original-Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 30rxw9qg7y-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 02 May 2020 18:08:00 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0014.oracle.com (abhmp0014.oracle.com [141.146.116.20]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 042I7wIJ017471; Sat, 2 May 2020 18:07:58 GMT In-Reply-To: <3bd09dca-dcdc-7569-e5fb-f6b53397af9d@yandex.ru> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4993.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9609 signatures=668687 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=18 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=751 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005020161 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9609 signatures=668687 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=18 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=797 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005020161 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=156.151.31.85; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=userp2120.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/02 13:11:05 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 156.151.31.85 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248516 Archived-At: > If the name strpbrk speaks to your heart, more power to you. >=20 > But let's not use it as an argument that function names don't need to > convey information. Let's not exaggerate. Has anyone argued against function names generally needing to convey info?