From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 18:46:58 +0200 Message-ID: <8a53639e-4ffe-6545-8a10-45d3b547e47d@yandex.ru> References: <1552789070.5272.1@yandex.ru> <1552791707.5272.2@yandex.ru> <1552793646.5272.3@yandex.ru> <1552821396.21432.0@yandex.ru> <83imwhwf4x.fsf@gnu.org> <837ecvux2q.fsf@gnu.org> <9c7cf558-a2d3-951e-d6e1-31b3ad5900cf@yandex.ru> <1553248918.28810.1@yandex.ru> <8336nfrq50.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhpnq8ka.fsf@gnu.org> <6d9c2238-0942-3084-57b6-ab94b5e9a907@yandex.ru> <83o963q620.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="203148"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 22 18:07:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h7NdZ-000qk9-SW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 18:07:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60307 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7NdY-0003Rb-M9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:07:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7NSd-0002tX-4K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:56:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7NJu-0002qO-SY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x341.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::341]:33162) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7NJu-0002p0-Cb; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x341.google.com with SMTP id z6so4723569wmi.0; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:47:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uaFiMOBkrTMSe9OAS/MYot935rTvuNioUnHwBNeX8rc=; b=Q1zEz0MXe0mTpYFs6FSMP8i0NvmRXyc6AlFjM9b83IRHHaA2TDgJqJo6YPIyD/8E2U fesIW4epCz2zMSv/rws/cd9+g6dbpo1EFHb96gHUZL17kfXTGWxHUtk818CZEznSG2Xc inORum39drwcJBBwaJfZMMBUAaJbesnrFm9o19TGvPezzDrvoDDZCii1A23XVWXy8wZd kz4S8n2Lluf+wp4x+Gm4hXu+mg1tduNaiUyz/lA2OL6JHxduxVcX7ULn12McA8wxjy+L pJ1KZ4PWrU6/Z78mR1gSOkQN4N1xL4A/0GsuY7Dl2tGeRTMKvoGag3JU28MdAV1d2ben 10hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uaFiMOBkrTMSe9OAS/MYot935rTvuNioUnHwBNeX8rc=; b=sDdfbXFmylVH5eVWF/g/Nd5npJEwiBYWQFVcbH++rGQ4Lg20mD5XQlyzwagWixgeIQ qzPvSOEleSQA3ugoRmdw5YMhWHmmPpwoac7vbz2Pl6YV5jviytcH7fcvAI5D3zkteeJN oi8toTF/yQU82kIRb42GutnoYEw1OHyA0awFCirAa7dQ13S2JrxHLnPm4UELpUqDOZYV BcpnnhQrZkXvRjI5WnpSVOhFjMyZafABgi5sC++XYoeLu1j80QidU3fBtwHVvtbb8TT3 Gd7teH2kL+xp4lfrwEErTsep09ah+LqNA0jkbMHhdy9mDxVy/oETNsfT79LHELYlF+p9 KLlw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWV7qGiajsXzm7CY6qvvH4Y0anJ9A3JTBaYMppnk2NRvYKRaG9M jUvxYUqelidoC7xhWkxM1yjTK5+P X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwfGSRSh+tGBB5PGijuslOkuVS4Lnzi0nMJpcoyUWpNSCPw54PTHiR0vvqefG4PUe/62g29nA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:415:: with SMTP id 21mr3856250wme.109.1553273220831; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:47:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.195] ([109.110.245.170]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 7sm25346177wrc.81.2019.03.22.09.46.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:46:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83o963q620.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::341 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234602 Archived-At: On 22.03.2019 17:31, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I don't know. Maybe it cannot. Which means the solution is not > perfect, but it doesn't mean it's totally useless, because it does > improve the current situation to some extent. Sometimes a less-than-accurate solution feels worse than a no solution. To me, at least. > A separate mailing list will make patch review much less convenient, > because it will require the reviewer to read and respond to two > different threads on two different lists. So I would object to such a > change. TBH, that was me still making a case against an email-based workflow altogether. More to come later (hopefully, something more helpful).