From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Mattias_Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: :alnum: broken? Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:04:12 +0100 Message-ID: <8DA6D8F4-921B-4FB8-A7A3-CE75B10CE668@acm.org> References: <86wo8flqct.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <86sgj3ljf0.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <5fecc0e1-1ee2-5a89-9297-b0b9aa4a8e9c@cs.ucla.edu> <03A37C4B-9FE8-4A25-9851-79BC8265455E@acm.org> <142e845d-eba3-5975-fa63-4c1b14ed4600@cs.ucla.edu> <3A14F30E-60EF-4C99-AC1A-9A1B2539169B@acm.org> <837e07gmka.fsf@gnu.org> <1c654ac9-10a2-4e5d-f77c-3b78bb580ffc@cs.ucla.edu> <83v9nqg8la.fsf@gnu.org> <298a093f-6eed-3a9f-99cf-bd17b9cb61f0@cs.ucla.edu> <83blpifp95.fsf@gnu.org> <81bfdae0-9fe1-f173-adb1-b5fe2ba2b808@cs.ucla.edu> <834kvafnwk.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="130511"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 28 22:05:32 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j7mpA-000XpE-24 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:05:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53920 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j7mp9-0002Fz-2R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:05:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j7moA-0000uP-LG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:04:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7mo9-0005Cu-Fn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:04:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mail227c50.megamailservers.eu ([91.136.10.237]:42902 helo=mail36c50.megamailservers.eu) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j7mo8-0005CC-Ta; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:04:29 -0500 X-Authenticated-User: mattiase@bredband.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=megamailservers.eu; s=maildub; t=1582923856; bh=V0mVRnyYXBdZr/7+JdpbCXfahK5oQvKac3zurte1jY4=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=AoK5HnBbM3RcMvrd6+7RnhgZwMRuxzZIWJDZADC4MniXoxZKCm1u8N4tbai59OIeX nZdC/g4T94YuUSx6zIJ+bKbMLDiQXrem79Xh/oaRIkcY1dQAmfYdVsqowS31y7pFlu jH6KQ/pb39vE2Jm0jdfCFX+AFU78Mse6RjisWzPg= Feedback-ID: mattiase@acm.or Original-Received: from [192.168.0.4] (c188-150-171-71.bredband.comhem.se [188.150.171.71]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail36c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id 01SL4CZx016390; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 21:04:14 +0000 In-Reply-To: <834kvafnwk.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A782F21.5E59804D.0033, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.3 cv=bd8Vr9HB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:117 a=SF+I6pRkHZhrawxbOkkvaA==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=M51BFTxLslgA:10 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=wV-djhUqm_vbCCL4SQ4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x (no timestamps) [generic] X-Received-From: 91.136.10.237 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245113 Archived-At: 28 feb. 2020 kl. 21.38 skrev Eli Zaretskii : > A couple of solutions was proposed that could be regarded as > compromises, and allow us to flag these suspicious regexps in at least > some of the use cases. I'm okay with those proposals, but not with > the radical one you described. What about adding a variable controlling the change, defaulting to the = stricter semantics? Users who depend on the looser interpretation, or = find that the change would cramp their style, will happily set that = variable permanently and suffer no ill effects. Everyone get what they = want!