From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jan D." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: DOC for Mac OS shown for Emacs compiled for X. Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:39:46 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <8B99E438-2A81-11D9-A454-000D93505B76@swipnet.se> References: <20041029080140.SPWE44.mxfep02.bredband.com@coolsville.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1099147280 19666 80.91.229.6 (30 Oct 2004 14:41:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 30 16:41:10 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CNuPl-0006oU-00 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:41:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNuXf-00037X-PC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:49:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CNuXZ-00037S-5I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:49:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CNuXY-00037G-OZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:49:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNuXY-00037D-Lx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:49:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.54.107.70] (helo=mxfep01.bredband.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CNuPS-0001Yr-0X; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 10:40:50 -0400 Original-Received: from coolsville.localdomain ([83.226.180.220] [83.226.180.220]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20041030144045.HYIW4883.mxfep01.bredband.com@coolsville.localdomain>; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 16:40:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: Original-To: rms@gnu.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29173 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29173 > Is the approach in the attached patch OK? I generate a list with > the objects used to build Emacs and in Snarf-documentation I > compare the files in DOC with that list. If not in that list, > those sections in DOC are skipped. > > On further thought, I believe this is not correct. The DOC file > should be independent of the platform, as someone else pointed out. Then we need to include symbols from all w32 files also. But the patch doesn't make the DOC file dependent on platform, it just makes the Emacs binary selective of what it reads from it. Jan D.