Re: Tree-sitter api

[Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>]

> 
> ada-mode takes the approach of embedding the indent rules directly in
> the grammar, and the functions that do that provide a few more options
> than yours. To see the definition of those functions, you'll have to
> install the wisi package, and look in wisi.info, section Grammar
> actions. (it would be nice if that info/html file was linked from the
> GNU ELPA package page; I'll start a new thread for that).

I had a cursory look at the manual for indent in wisi and have some questions. Why does wisi indent from “low-level productions”? (I think most indentation engine works line-by-line from the first line.) I don’t know much about how wisi works, but the indentation system seems to stem from circumstances quite different from that of tree-sitter. For example, wiki’s indent is devised alongside the grammar definition, while for tree-sitter, all the hard work of defining grammar is done for me and I’m merely a user of the grammar: that makes indenting with tree-sitter a much simpler job.

A problem I have with smie (and maybe wisi, but I didn’t look into wisi) is its seeming complexity. I’m merely a 22-year-old who drank too much coca-cola, and smie is too complicated for my soaked brain to comprehend. Having a traumatized experience trying to use smie[1], I want to make my indentation system as straightforward as possible. It doesn’t have to be complicated anyway, since it does so much less than wisi and smie. Right now I’d say it’s pretty simple, and most tasks (in indenting C) can be reasonably done, and I imagine difficult cases can be solved by writing custom matcher and anchor functions.

Stefan, can you have a look at tree-sitter-simple-indent? It’s like two messages up? It goes generally along the (pos . offset) idea but has some twists.

[1] Of course, I need to define the grammar when using smie while not when using tree-sitter, so it’s like comparing apple to pears, but I can’t resist finally telling a joke on the list.

Thanks,
Yuan