From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Theodor Thornhill via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Remove js--treesit-backward-up-list or fix it Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 22:12:01 +0200 Message-ID: <884E2113-CC23-40E6-ACB0-9D1614E59FEE@thornhill.no> References: <8B978AF7-B1CA-4C8A-9E89-84D0DEC7884C@gmail.com> <87h6znxkr0.fsf@thornhill.no> <0849BE6B-B5B4-47E0-B4EA-F93F6947C2B7@gmail.com> <87h6zmscqj.fsf@thornhill.no> <092C50FE-FCA3-43A2-B296-A3D61C88F2E3@gmail.com> <874jvmjuj8.fsf@thornhill.no> <51DEB610-69E9-46D9-865E-2F35BB1230A2@gmail.com> Reply-To: Theodor Thornhill Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26990"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuan Fu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 29 22:12:32 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oosBz-0006rM-Cd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 22:12:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oosBh-0006l0-JU; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 16:12:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oosBf-0006ke-8t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 16:12:12 -0400 Original-Received: from out2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:aacc::]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oosBd-00041u-HN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 16:12:11 -0400 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. In-Reply-To: <51DEB610-69E9-46D9-865E-2F35BB1230A2@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:41d0:2:aacc::; envelope-from=theo@thornhill.no; helo=out2.migadu.com X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298781 Archived-At: On 29 October 2022 22:08:39 CEST, Yuan Fu wrote: > > >> On Oct 29, 2022, at 12:31 PM, Theodor Thornhill w= rote: >>=20 >>=20 >>>=20 >>> I don=E2=80=99t have anything intelligent to say about the init proces= s >>> (except that we definitely need a way for js2-mode to turn off >>> tree-sitter setup made by js-mode even if it is enabled by the user), >>> but I fixed the indent problem you observed :-) >>>=20 >>=20 >> Ah you were faster than me=2E > >A whip named shame was chasing after me=2E > Hah!=20 >> Well, you can disregard most of the patch I >> just sent to bug-gnu-emacs, but we still need the fix in parent-bol=2E = We >> need back-to-indentation+point, not current-indentation, don't we? > >Right=2E My brain is not having its best time today :-) I applied your ch= ange=2E Thanks! > > :-) No worries! Theo