From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feedback on customize -- apropos-groups et al Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:48:06 +0300 Organization: JURTA Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87zn2shu1l.fsf@jurta.org> References: <020601c4aefd$8de795a0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097592652 8838 80.91.229.6 (12 Oct 2004 14:50:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 12 16:50:29 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CHNyu-0000gr-00 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:50:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHO5u-0007Ny-9G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:57:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CHO5T-0007Ep-Bn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:57:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CHO5S-0007EF-HJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:57:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHO5S-0007Dt-2x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:57:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [66.33.205.9] (helo=spatula.dreamhost.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CHNxe-00009J-Dc; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:49:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.jurta.org (80-235-44-248-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.44.248]) by spatula.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F19217D024; Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:45:16 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28302 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28302 Richard Stallman writes: > In many surveys about web pages it is found that users mostly want web page > links to look just like default links. This is blue underlined. Maybe this > would be good for Emacs too? > > Does this change do what you suggest? What do people think of it? I initially thought that since unlike Web browsers Info buffers have no other text highlighted in blue besides Info links, so additional distinction by underlining is not needed. But if the goal is to make Info links look exactly like Web links, I have no objections against this. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/