From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: key to yank text at point into minibuffer? Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:27:07 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87zmkn9qv4.fsf@jurta.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1140389904 11319 80.91.229.2 (19 Feb 2006 22:58:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:58:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 19 23:58:22 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FAxVJ-0008Ka-Ot for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:58:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FAxVI-0001LV-IF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 17:58:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FAtUd-000646-5Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:41:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FAt6p-00009g-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:17:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FAsoF-00052P-8l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 12:57:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.111] (helo=mail.neti.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FAsu6-0008NX-3a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:03:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-43-236-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.43.236]) by Relayhost1.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id B645260AA; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:57:21 +0200 (EET) Original-To: Kevin Rodgers In-Reply-To: (Kevin Rodgers's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:16:09 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50767 Archived-At: >> . Isn't it good practice to show the mode name in the lighter? Shouldn't >> people see whether or not they are in ffap mode? > > I don't know. I figure the global minor modes I'm familiar with > (auto-compression, font-lock, and mouse-wheel) don't show up in the mode > line so I'd leave it out. But then, those modes don't override default > keybindings either. What does everyone think? The mode line is already too overburdened, so I think adding a label for ffap is not desirable. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/