From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Markus Triska Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Nonsensical byte compiler warning. Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:35:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87zm5o1fnd.fsf@gmx.at> References: <85ps6okoe5.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87lkhcj791.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87tzvwvj6c.fsf@gmx.at> <861wj04qcq.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <873b3gpn4u.fsf@gmx.at> <86fy7g34tk.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <877issii2y.fsf@gmx.at> <86bqi430kv.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175690135 3085 80.91.229.12 (4 Apr 2007 12:35:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 12:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, Chong Yidong , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 04 14:35:32 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HZ4i3-0007b8-7i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:35:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZ4lI-0002UE-T0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:38:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HZ4lF-0002U4-2W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:38:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HZ4lC-0002Ts-Ft for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:38:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZ4lC-0002Tp-AG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:38:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HZ4hv-0007i3-Lx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:35:24 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Apr 2007 12:35:21 -0000 Original-Received: from chello062178240212.3.14.tuwien.teleweb.at (EHLO enterprise) [62.178.240.212] by mail.gmx.net (mp052) with SMTP; 04 Apr 2007 14:35:21 +0200 X-Authenticated: #4064391 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/+pjBLvLv+Cs2iKPb/B6ukz8Q+AnrXj7+Z6M6Tto VGI45WAnw6tZ5q In-Reply-To: <86bqi430kv.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Wed\, 04 Apr 2007 12\:17\:52 +0200") X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69044 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > But not even for that the reported number is really helpful since it > does not return the line number of the start or end of the defun > (which would give the user the clue that the line number is not > related to the point of error, but rather the function definition), > but rather a line in the function body that is somewhat close to the > actual beginning of the defun. That depends on whether an "interactive" declaration is present. See byte-compile-lambda in bytecomp.el.