From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ralf Angeli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Maintenance suggestion on an emacs mode Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:28:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87zlrlskgd.fsf@photon.caeruleus.net> References: <87wsn667kw.fsf@gmail.com> <87d4ojxgj2.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208896163 24852 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2008 20:29:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:29:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: Paul R Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 22 22:29:56 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JoP7U-0007NN-5I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:29:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JoP6o-00004w-F3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:28:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JoP6e-0008PF-Nw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:28:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JoP6d-0008Mn-52 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:28:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JoP6d-0008MP-17 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:28:47 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JoP6c-0001tI-DP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:28:46 -0400 Original-Received: from photon.caeruleus.net (p54A52AC2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.165.42.194]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu6) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML29c-1JoP6Q39Fc-0008LX; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:28:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87d4ojxgj2.fsf@gmail.com> (Paul R.'s message of "Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:29:53 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19Pw95EWps7E0jFu3gg6165pF0VZh0mCW7Sxnc 1jCHfw7atvxJg83/M91L09Mh5qeHKm5VQ560mPIW39T4Fn8q5A 37SkxNYtkL7hLsjzms91Q== X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95802 Archived-At: * Paul R. (2008-04-21) writes: >> ,---- RefTex : >> >> Those bindings are not activated by default, in this sens they are >> much like those of modula2 and html-mode. Should they be changed in >> the same way ? > > This patch change them. > (when reftex-extra-bindings > - (loop for x in > - '(("\C-ct" . reftex-toc) > - ("\C-cl" . reftex-label) > - ("\C-cr" . reftex-reference) > - ("\C-cc" . reftex-citation) > - ("\C-cv" . reftex-view-crossref) > - ("\C-cg" . reftex-grep-document) > - ("\C-cs" . reftex-search-document)) Please don't change those. There are already bindings for them (except for the last two) in place. Setting `reftex-extra-bindings' really is only there to spare users the hassle of defining bindings in the user space themselves. -- Ralf