From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Phil Hagelberg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Requesting bzr repository of emacs on savannah Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:57:32 -0700 Message-ID: <87zlmm34zn.fsf@hagelb.org> References: <140183.72815.qm@web95007.mail.in2.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220633946 14743 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2008 16:59:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 16:59:06 +0000 (UTC) To: =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Kyllingstad , Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 05 18:59:58 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kbeew-0001Sf-RX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:59:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45576 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kbedw-0002LM-JD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:58:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kbecw-0001ui-4T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:57:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kbect-0001tk-GE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:57:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37626 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kbect-0001th-Av for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:57:39 -0400 Original-Received: from sd-green-bigip-207.dreamhost.com ([208.97.132.207]:37817 helo=spunkymail-a10.g.dreamhost.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kbecs-0004VR-So for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:57:39 -0400 Original-Received: from dynabook (unknown [63.229.31.77]) by spunkymail-a10.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7DC16151D; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 09:58:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Ren?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9?= Kyllingstad"'s message of "Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:09:42 -0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103568 Archived-At: Ren=C3=A9 Kyllingstad writes: > http://www.google.com/trends?q=3Dbzr,hg,git While I don't deny that bzr is less popular than git and mercurial, Git and Hg are both words with many meanings, while bzr is a unique term. Notice that of the six top news results shown for "hg" and "git", only one of them is actually related to a version control system; the rest are all different meanings for the term. So linking to that graph is very misleading. I use git for my personal projects, but I'm looking forward to finally moving away from CVS. If bzr is ready for Emacs, Emacs is certainly ready for bzr. -Phil http://technomancy.us