From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ralf Angeli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.auctex.bugs Subject: Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 2009-01-24; RefTeX documentation needs update Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:09:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87zlgx89sv.fsf@photon.caeruleus.net> References: <87tz75ky97.fsf@tum.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234091438 30200 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2009 11:10:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 11:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-auctex@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: uwe.siart@tum.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 08 12:11:53 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LW7Zi-00015r-5P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:11:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52056 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LW7YO-00033e-N2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 06:10:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LW7XS-0002ld-2Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 06:09:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LW7XQ-0002kk-SB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 06:09:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57522 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LW7XQ-0002kc-4k; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 06:09:24 -0500 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:50270) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LW7XP-00027t-BA; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 06:09:23 -0500 Original-Received: from photon.caeruleus.net (p54A532D2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.165.50.210]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKwtQ-1LW7XN2d33-00055q; Sun, 08 Feb 2009 12:09:22 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: uwe.siart@tum.de, bug-auctex@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87tz75ky97.fsf@tum.de> (Uwe Siart's message of "Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:40:20 +0100") X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18E0V4KYQnSFE0VCY9KCglXT+A2acWcS4AGzSV hA0vKqxhniU7AG4tkdiVxmO+aLInvLukjBi9bMFiTEURXg6FGh wr/SmN4y3qz5uiw3FJ8tQ== X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108870 gmane.emacs.auctex.bugs:1504 Archived-At: * Uwe Siart (2009-02-08) writes: > I just follow the advice from the AUCTeX website to report RefTeX stuff to the > AUCTeX lists. So I hope this is not OT. > > The info node (info "(reftex) Key Bindings") does not reflect that the extra > binding prefix has been changed to "C-cC-y". Therefore at a first glance one > might think that reftex-extra-bindings is broken in Emacs 23. The bindings haven't changed in the standalone version of RefTeX, only in Emacs. I will not port this change to the standalone version because it misses the point of `reftex-extra-bindings' deliberately putting the bindings into the user's `C-c ' key binding domain. I'd rather ask the Emacs maintainers to back out the change in the Emacs repository. -- Ralf