From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Status of IPA patch? Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:45:24 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87zl9jn2nf.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <4A807E29.1030405@gmail.com> <19072.33612.609778.383349@parhasard.net> <19091.42502.25570.15813@parhasard.net> <871vmz39dk.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <19095.20639.983609.638911@parhasard.net> <19095.35014.50774.460834@parhasard.net> <19095.52379.484481.908427@parhasard.net> <87skfbstfp.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <19096.12810.172426.506473@parhasard.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251493610 20429 80.91.229.12 (28 Aug 2009 21:06:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Oleksandr Gavenko , Miles Bader To: Aidan Kehoe Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 28 23:06:42 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mh8ee-0001ck-10 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:06:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36671 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mh8ed-00009O-CG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:06:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mh7PE-0000Sz-Sy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:46:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mh7P8-0000Ot-KP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:46:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36230 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mh7P8-0000On-D8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:46:34 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-out1.starman.ee ([85.253.0.3]:38302 helo=mx1.starman.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mh7P6-0006mC-5r; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:46:32 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx1.starman.ee Original-Received: from mail.starman.ee (82.131.54.133.cable.starman.ee [82.131.54.133]) by mx1.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3885E3F40CC; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:46:26 +0300 (EEST) In-Reply-To: <19096.12810.172426.506473@parhasard.net> (Aidan Kehoe's message of "Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:37:46 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114787 Archived-At: > > > > (Is there any other major software to be compatible with?) > > > > > > Well, SCIM, but that=E2=80=99s not really major. My friend Clint, = here: > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D499558 preferre= d the > > > script G when he adapted the Kirshenbaum method to SCIM, and didn=E2= =80=99t > > > offere a choice; if anyone has an SCIM install, I=E2=80=99d be cur= ious as to > > > what that does with its X-SAMPA input. > > > > Both X-SAMPA and Kirshenbaum SCIM inputs use U+0261 for `g'. > > > > IPA-X-SAMPA: > > g =C9=A1 0 # U+0261 LATIN SMALL LETTER SCRIPT G > > > > IPA-Kirshenbaum: > > g =C9=A1 0 # U+0261 LATIN SMALL LETTER SCRIPT G > > > > I see no reason to deviate from this standard in Emacs. > > SCIM is a standard? Interesting perspective. SCIM follows the standard, so there is no reason for Emacs not to do the same. --=20 Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/