From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giorgos Keramidas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU Emacs is on Bazaar now. Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:26:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87zl52zf9u.fsf@kobe.laptop> References: <87d4206n80.fsf@canonical.com> <87637qhjqu.fsf@red-bean.com> <87skaug2jm.fsf@red-bean.com> <874ona1sfh.fsf@kobe.laptop> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262053638 21839 80.91.229.12 (29 Dec 2009 02:27:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 02:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Karl Fogel , Kenichi Handa , Andreas Schwab , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 29 03:27:11 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NPRni-0001nu-ND for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:27:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44227 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPRni-0008MY-Rb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:27:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPRnd-0008MJ-W8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:27:06 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPRnY-0008Lm-KG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:27:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52037 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPRnY-0008Lj-EV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:27:00 -0500 Original-Received: from poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr ([150.140.141.169]:37448) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPRnY-0004q0-1x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:27:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr (unknown [10.1.0.143]) by poseidon.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B03EB4804; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:26:59 +0200 (EET) Original-Received: from localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3402D44FE2; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:27:01 +0200 (EET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ceid.upatras.gr Original-Received: from mail.ceid.upatras.gr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (europa.ceid.upatras.gr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id elivR2Zd-26g; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:27:01 +0200 (EET) Original-Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp-94-64-194-143.home.otenet.gr [94.64.194.143]) by mail.ceid.upatras.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C6744FDF; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:27:00 +0200 (EET) Original-Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBT2QvjD085026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:26:57 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Original-Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBT2Qs1h085023; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:26:54 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:08:07 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (berkeley-unix) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118907 Archived-At: On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:08:07 +0100, Juanma Barranquero w= rote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 02:26, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> I personally find this sort of workflow a bit useful when dealing with >> tiny changesets. =A0The final branch history of trunk is going to be much >> "cleaner" if we don't have thousands of tiny changesets followed by a >> merge commit after each small one. > > A way to do the equivalent of "git rebase -i" would be nice, too. I've only been using "bzr rebase" for a few hours. I don't see anything that resembles "git rebase -i" in the documentation of the current bzr plugin, so it's possible that there is no equivalent. It's conceivable that a careful combination of "bzr shelve" and the existing "bzr rebase" functionality may be one way to achieve similar results with "git rebase -i". If this turns out to be too complex, we should probably focus on an easy workflow for small changes first and leave more complex history manipulation tricks for later.