From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: adding branches to bzr? Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:44:27 -0500 Message-ID: <87zl4hocac.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87y6k1k7zd.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263422694 13521 80.91.229.12 (13 Jan 2010 22:44:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 13 23:44:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVBxG-000515-D0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:44:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39174 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVBxG-0004aI-Rr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:44:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVBxC-0004Z8-2x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:44:42 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVBx6-0004Yd-IK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:44:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47771 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVBx6-0004Ya-CT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:44:36 -0500 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([66.146.206.141]:49347) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVBx6-0004y9-2V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:44:36 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40307 helo=kfogel-work ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NVBx3-0004kg-HK; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:44:33 -0600 In-Reply-To: <87y6k1k7zd.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:31:02 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119940 Archived-At: Chong Yidong writes: >My understanding is that there's negligible cost to adding multiple bzr >branches to the central repo (in terms of, say, server resources or bzr >log output). Is that right? If so, I guess it won't hurt to start >making branches for the features lined up for Emacs 24 (which we'll >begin concentrating on in a couple months, once 23.2 draws closer to >release). If they're all in a shared repository without working trees on Savannah, (which I believe to be the case), then branches are very cheap, yes.