From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix IDO interaction with uniquify.el Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 23:43:19 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87zl0d4114.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87k4vf1zdh.fsf@telefonica.net> <87tyujz57h.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ockrz4eu.fsf@telefonica.net> <87pr57uw25.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <878w7y6u92.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1273179296 26071 80.91.229.12 (6 May 2010 20:54:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 20:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes , Leo , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 06 22:54:54 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OA85t-0007kr-UT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 22:54:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50508 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OA85t-0005VP-E7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 16:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1OA85l-0005SP-Vz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 16:54:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55474 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OA85j-0005OI-Nw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 16:54:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OA85g-0008Kx-N0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 16:54:43 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-out1.starman.ee ([85.253.0.3]:45691 helo=mx1.starman.ee) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OA85g-0008KL-HV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 16:54:40 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx1.starman.ee Original-Received: from mail.starman.ee (82.131.33.106.cable.starman.ee [82.131.33.106]) by mx1.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B7E3F41B5; Thu, 6 May 2010 23:54:34 +0300 (EEST) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Wed, 5 May 2010 20:59:16 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124604 Archived-At: > (defun ido-kill-buffer-at-head () > "Kill the buffer at the head of `ido-matches'. A better function name would be `ido-shoot-buffer-at-head' :-) Seriously I wonder how virtual buffers could be used for restoring window configurations. When a buffer is killed, after restoring a window configuration we need to display some virtual buffer in place of the killed buffer. I don't understand if ido virtual buffers are intended for something like that? -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/