From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The copyright issue Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:53:31 +0900 Message-ID: <87zkwvflec.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <19546.32875.515000.117266@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <86iq3pav0s.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <87eiecihi3.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281394516 24594 80.91.229.12 (9 Aug 2010 22:55:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:55:16 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 10 00:55:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OibFT-0003WQ-DV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:55:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53282 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OibFS-0003tO-US for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:55:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59463 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OibFM-0003tJ-4H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:55:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OibFK-0001iT-QC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:55:08 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:36515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OibFK-0001iJ-HU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OibFI-0003Pa-1L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:55:04 +0200 Original-Received: from 218.231.154.125.eo.eaccess.ne.jp ([218.231.154.125]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:55:04 +0200 Original-Received: from miles by 218.231.154.125.eo.eaccess.ne.jp with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:55:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 218.231.154.125.eo.eaccess.ne.jp System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Cancel-Lock: sha1:pSSZgl41XLvb7YvcJkC1qB7Wx2E= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128518 Archived-At: Dan Nicolaescu writes: >> I do think it's important to note that Aquamacs is basically a pretty >> friendly port. > > It's good that it's changed, it didn't use to be that way. How so? I know that they've got their own idiosyncratic ideas of how the Emacs UI should look (awful, but apparently consistent with macos), and it doesn't really jive all that well with mainstream Emacs, but that's not what I'm talking about. I'm just talking about the attitudes of the maintainers. -Miles -- A zen-buddhist walked into a pizza shop and said, "Make me one with everything."