From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:16:45 -0400 Message-ID: <87zkjbgbgi.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <8662mgg2ea.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1313342220 31489 80.91.229.12 (14 Aug 2011 17:17:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?SsOpcsOpbXk=?= Compostella Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 14 19:16:56 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QseIw-0005a0-5s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 19:16:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58046 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QseIv-0002mi-Dv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:16:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60267) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QseIt-0002m5-1e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:16:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QseIs-0005jw-2F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:16:50 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.144]:60705) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QseIs-0005js-09 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:16:50 -0400 Original-Received: from furball ([64.134.68.235]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-03.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7EHGkik026209 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 14 Aug 2011 13:16:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8662mgg2ea.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IkrDqXLDqW15?= Compostella"'s message of "Tue, 02 Aug 2011 01:03:57 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.144 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.144 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143213 Archived-At: J=C3=A9r=C3=A9my Compostella writes: > I'm trying to modify the behavior of the kill-buffer function to fit my > needs. I would like to limit the list of eligible buffers used to select > the buffer which will be displayed in place of the killed buffer. > > I have tried to advice the other-buffer function which seems called > (Cf. buffer.c) You probably want to define a custom kill-buffer command, and bind that command to C-x k, instead of advising kill-buffer.