From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: completion-list-mode-map Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:20:10 -0400 Message-ID: <87zkj3hout.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <4DEA3F21.2020302@gmail.com> <4E0FB543.9040608@gmail.com> <4E13BC5A.2070007@gmail.com> <4E191159.1080501@gmail.com> <4E375A1C.6020108@gmail.com> <87ty9jganp.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87r54md7yt.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E4ABCA1.1060703@gmx.at> <4E4AD90C.4060007@gmx.at> <87hb5h6mg4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E4B848D.1040007@gmx.at> <87fwkzrcvz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E4CB7E0.6060901@gmx.at> <87r54iz6b5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4E4E0D33.6060908@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1313868025 24354 80.91.229.12 (20 Aug 2011 19:20:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 19:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Christoph Scholtes , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 20 21:20:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qur5f-0004Lg-Hj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 21:20:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38642 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qur5f-0007IL-0u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:20:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qur5b-0007ID-V8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:20:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qur5a-0000gN-ET for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:20:15 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.146]:51742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qur5a-0000gJ-Ce for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:20:14 -0400 Original-Received: from furball ([64.134.100.139]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-05.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7KJKBN1010742 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:20:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4E4E0D33.6060908@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:13:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.146 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.146 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143467 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: > Yes. But IIUC this should have beed seen in the context of making "q" > quit the window in `special-mode-map'. And I said that `quit-window' > has its own live outside of `special-mode-map', something we probably > shouldn't touch. > > That said I have no problems doing either of > > (1) binding "q" in special-mode-map to `quit-restore-window', or > > (2) renaming `quit-restore-window' to `quit-window', reverting its > arguments order. > > Personally I'd prefer (1) since it's cleaner, doesn't require any > changes to existing code, and doesn't affect people having bound > `quit-window' to some key in their .emacs. Can you provide an example of a situation in which caller of quit-window would not want the quit-restore-window behavior?