From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Inefficiency in Bgotoifnil byte-code instruction Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:24:36 -0600 Message-ID: <87zk7gtzpn.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <87k3yq2htz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87y5n2vupa.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87wr2kvr6g.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87ipe4vjy1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341343496 30478 80.91.229.3 (3 Jul 2012 19:24:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 19:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Mohamed Ben-Ahssene , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Aur=C3=A9lien?= Aptel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 03 21:24:54 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm8iM-0000CZ-Ea for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 21:24:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36216 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm8iL-0004ty-DI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:24:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm8iI-0004tt-Kr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:24:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm8iH-0006cL-3H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:24:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:25657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm8iG-0006c6-QO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 15:24:41 -0400 Original-Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q63JOcnN028310 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:24:38 -0400 Original-Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q63JOaas013046 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:24:37 -0400 X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Aur=C3=A9lien?= Aptel"'s message of "Tue, 3 Jul 2012 19:53:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.12 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151399 Archived-At: Aur=C3=A9lien> Is there a reason why all the opcode definitions (e.g. #Bcar= 0100) are Aur=C3=A9lien> not using an enum? It's easier to read and it logically grou= ps Aur=C3=A9lien> constants. Just history. Tom