From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nix Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.windows Subject: Re: emacs-20120702-r108826 Windows Binaries Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:05:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87zk7gixlu.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> References: <4ff14711.f105320a.2835.2886@mx.google.com> <065703D06FED41B6B759E0ABA0227BE6@us.oracle.com> <82wr2mkus5.fsf@gmail.com> <2F0995551D4340EC9F173B50B3E045B3@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341335165 26855 80.91.229.3 (3 Jul 2012 17:06:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 17:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Sivaram Neelakantan' , help-emacs-windows@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 03 19:06:04 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm6Y6-0002Wj-3p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 19:06:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38638 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm6Y5-0002jD-1G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:06:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm6Xx-0002ba-Ns for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:05:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm6Xw-0007XG-1m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:05:53 -0400 Original-Received: from icebox.esperi.org.uk ([81.187.191.129]:48460 helo=mail.esperi.org.uk) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sm6Xn-0007UX-Td; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 13:05:44 -0400 Original-Received: from esperi.org.uk (nix@spindle.srvr.nix [192.168.14.15]) by mail.esperi.org.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q63H5Xcx031225; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:05:33 +0100 Original-Received: (from nix@localhost) by esperi.org.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q63H5XmM012293; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:05:33 +0100 Emacs: freely redistributable; void where prohibited by law. In-Reply-To: <2F0995551D4340EC9F173B50B3E045B3@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 2 Jul 2012 09:22:31 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-URT-Metrics: spindle 1060; Body=4 Fuz1=4 Fuz2=4 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 81.187.191.129 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151395 gmane.emacs.windows:5468 Archived-At: On 2 Jul 2012, Drew Adams spake thusly: >> I haven't had a problem so far but I did notice your email id. Does >> your firm have new internet usage policies in place that caps by >> Mbytes? The place where I used to work, the filters came on at 10am >> to 4pm where speeds were reduced/throttled for http/ftp. >> Guessing here. > > Dunno, but I'm not aware of any such change. Certainly nobody has told anyone within my part of the same organization of such a policy. (I could name a number of people who would have high-pressure steam coming out of their ears if such a policy was imposed.) The proxy has had periods of not-working-at-all-well intermittently reported over the last few days, though. It is generally wise to try to not put too much load on the poor little thing. -- NULL && (void)